International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy: VAT group regime in Italy


Andrea Rottoli

The 2017 Italian Finance Act implemented the VAT group regime in Italy, laid down by Article 11 of the VAT Directive. The provisions will enter into force from January 1 2018 and the regime will be effective as of 2019.

In broad terms, the Italian VAT group regime provides that VAT taxable persons acting as such (i.e. companies and individuals) having financial, economic and organisational links among themselves may opt to be treated as a single taxable person (i.e. a VAT group). Under the VAT group regime, supplies of goods and services between members of the group are no longer relevant for VAT purposes.

To be part of a VAT group in Italy, the following conditions must be jointly met:

  • Taxable persons joining the VAT group must be resident for VAT purposes in Italy;

  • "Financial", "economic" and "organisational" links must be satisfied between the members of the VAT group; and

  • A specific election must be filed with the Italian tax authorities.

A "financial" link is presumed to exist in cases in which a parent company directly or indirectly controls the majority of the voting rights of the subsidiaries. This presumption is rebuttable. The VAT group regime among subsidiaries can also apply if the parent company is established outside of Italy, provided that the state where the parent is established allows an effective exchange of information with Italy. An "economic" link is deemed to exist if the taxable persons concerned carry on similar activities that are ancillary to each other or activities that are substantially for the benefit of one of the participants. Finally, an "organisational" link is deemed to exist if the companies are subject to common coordination (direzione e coordinamento) as provided by Italian civil law.

In any event, "financial", "economic" and "organisational" links are always deemed to be met in case of direct or indirect control of voting rights (i.e. they are presumed to exist in case of a standard group situation). Where "financial", "economic" and "organisational" links are deemed to exist according to the above mentioned presumptions, in order to keep a subsidiary out of the VAT group, a ruling application must be filed to prove the absence of at least one of the above mentioned links.

The VAT group regime is indeed subject to an "all in – all out" rule. If a company, which meets the conditions to be part of the VAT group, does not opt in, then any tax benefit is assessed upon the VAT group as if the company were part of the VAT group. The election into the VAT group regime is forfeited, unless a new option including all subsidiaries is newly filed for the year following the one in which it has been assessed that a company was wrongly left out of the VAT group.

The possibility to be part of a VAT group is excluded for:

  • Non-resident taxable persons;

  • Foreign permanent establishments of resident taxable persons;

  • Taxable persons who are subject to certain pre-emptive judicial measures;

  • Taxable persons undergoing bankruptcy procedure; and

  • Taxable persons undergoing a liquidation/dissolution procedure.

The option must be filed by September 30 of the year before the year in which the regime is intended to apply and is valid for three years. Special rules apply if the "financial", "economic" and "organisational" links cease to exist.

The members of the VAT group are jointly and severally liable for VAT, penalties and interest deriving from assessment and control activities.

The implementation of the VAT group regime rules does not impinge on the possibility to opt for the existing Italian VAT consolidation system that will remain applicable.

Andrea Rottoli (, Milan

Maisto e Associati

Tel. +39 02 776931


more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The winners of the ITR Americas Tax Awards have been announced for 2023!
There is a ‘huge demand’ for tax services in the Middle East, says new Clyde & Co partner Rachel Fox in an interview with ITR.
The ECB warns the tax could leave banks with weaker capital levels, while the UAE publishes guidance on its new corporate tax regime.
Caroline Setliffe and Ben Shem-Tov of Eversheds Sutherland give an overview of the US transfer pricing penalty regime and UK diverted profits tax considerations for multinational companies.
The result follows what EY said was one of the most successful years in the firm’s history.