Germany: Germany proposed limitations on tax deductibility of royalty payments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Germany proposed limitations on tax deductibility of royalty payments

Linn-Alexander
Braun

Alexander Linn

Thorsten Braun

The German government decided on January 25 to introduce a bill into the legislative process that would limit the deductibility of royalty payments between related parties for payments that become due after December 31 2017.

The bill is based on a draft law published by the federal Ministry of Finance at the end of 2016.

The draft law addresses royalty payments that are subject to a "low taxation" of the royalty income at the level of the recipient due to the application of intellectual property regimes such as IP, patent or license boxes. The law is directed at beneficial "non-nexus"-based IP regimes. Low taxation of royalty income based on the general taxation of the recipient would not fall within the scope of the proposed rules.

The restriction on deductibility would apply only to royalty payments made between related parties. The draft law also targets payments made to indirect recipients that benefit from a preferential non-nexus-based IP regime resulting in low taxation. This approach would result in the disallowance of deductions in back-to-back royalty structures where only an indirect recipient benefits from the regime.

Low taxation under the draft law generally means an effective tax rate of less than 25%. The determination of whether the income is low-taxed would be made in accordance with the rules in the Foreign Tax Act.

However, low taxation would not automatically result in a full disallowance of the deduction of the royalty payment. The percentage of the disallowed payment would be calculated based on the applicable tax benefit at the level of the recipient (i.e. the difference between the applicable tax rate and a 25% tax rate). For example, if the tax rate at the level of the recipient is 10%, 60% of the royalty payment (which is 15/25%) would be non-deductible for German tax purposes and if the non-nexus based IP-regime provided for a 0% tax rate, the full amount of the royalty payment would be non-deductible.

The draft law contains exceptions to the deduction limitation for royalty payments made to subsidiaries of the German licensee that trigger the German controlled foreign company rules at the level of the subsidiary and for payments regarding trademark rights based on the definition in the Trademark Act.

"Nexus-based" preferential tax regimes that would fall outside the scope of the proposed rule include regimes whose benefits depend on a substantial economic activity (e.g. R&D). The draft law provides that a substantial economic activity would not exist where the recipient of the royalty payment did not fully or predominantly develop the underlying IP in its own business operations (e.g. if the IP was developed by related parties or acquired).

The outcome of the legislative process is unclear. However, because the draft law is supported by the governing coalition at the federal level, chances that the draft law will be enacted seem high.

Affected taxpayers should carefully monitor the legislative process.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article