Hong Kong: Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect opens

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong: Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect opens

ho-khoonming.jpg
lau.jpg

Khoonming Ho

Ayesha Macpherson Lau

The Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect cross-border share trading mechanism commenced operation on December 5 2016.

This complements the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect mechanism, in place since November 2014, and enables international investors to trade selected A-shares, listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SSE), via the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKSE). It also allows qualified mainland investors to trade in HKSE-listed shares via the SSE.

To facilitate cross-border investment activity, and in a similar manner to the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect, preferential Chinese tax treatments have been clarified.

On November 5 2016, the Ministry of Finance, China State Administration of Taxation (SAT) and the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued Circular 127. It announced temporary exemptions from Chinese income taxes (corporate and individual income tax) and value added tax (VAT) for trading gains arising to foreign investors on SSE-listed shares when transacted through the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect.

Going in the other direction, temporary income tax and VAT exemptions were also provided for the trading gains of Chinese investors arising from HKSE-listed shares when transacted through the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect (though the income tax exemption only extends to Chinese individuals and not Chinese corporations). Dividend income continues to be fully subject to tax, though the foreign investors can potentially access treaty relief.

The preferential tax treatments for Stock Connect trading gains sit alongside existing corporate income tax exemptions for A-share trading gains realised by foreign investors through the qualified foreign institutional investor (QFII) and renminbi QFII (RQFII) programmes. QFII and RQFII, operating more broadly than Stock Connect, also allow investment in other forms of listed investment (e.g. bonds, futures, units in Chinese mutual funds). No special VAT or income tax treatment is provided for these non A-share investments and, therefore, careful planning and the use of tax treaties, where available, are still needed.

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com) and Ayesha Macpherson Lau (ayesha.lau@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082 and +852 2826 7165

Website: www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Authors from Khaitan & Co dissect a ‘welcome’ ruling, which found that the mere existence of a tax benefit would not, by itself, warrant a principal purpose test
Over two-thirds of survey respondents back the continuation of the UK’s digital services tax, research commissioned by the Fair Tax Foundation also found
Given the US/G7 pillar two deal, the OECD is in danger of being replaced by the UN as the leading global tax reform forum
Cinven’s latest investment follows its acquisition of a stake in Grant Thornton UK in December; in other news, a barrister listed by HMRC as a tax avoidance promoter has alleged harassment
CIT base narrowing measures remain more prevalent than increased CIT rates, the report also highlighted
ITR's parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
KPMG UK’s Graeme Webster and KPMG Meijburg & Co’s Eduard Sporken outline the 20-year evolution of MAPAs, with DEMPE analyses becoming more prevalent and MAPA requirements growing stricter
Rishi Joshi, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, warns of potential judicial overreach as assets are recharacterised to bypass a legislative exclusion
Only 2% of in-house survey respondents said they were ‘heavy’ users of AI for TP, Aibidia’s report also found
There was a ‘deeply embedded culture within PwC that routinely disregarded formal confidentiality obligations,’ the chairman of Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board said
Gift this article