Politicians and campaigners are fond of saying that companies should pay their ‘fair share’ of tax, but the phrase is over-used and lacks legal meaning and backing, becoming little more than a cliché. However, new research has identified clauses in the Constitutions of 15 countries – including two of the G7 member states – which identify an obligation to contribute to the public purse. Joe Stanley-Smith explores how this could force companies to take more notice of the fair-share debate.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
Joe manages ITR’s online and print coverage, and the publication’s events worldwide. He covers a range of tax issues affecting multinational corporations, particularly indirect tax matters and case studies.
The Labour Party’s hands-off approach to tax during the UK election campaign could be construed as political savviness, but as the October budget looms, reality will settle in
Kevin Burrowes’ extra A$1.2 million remuneration has been the source of parliamentary concern, but PwC shot down ITR’s requests to reveal where it comes from
Spain and Poland are among the nations referred to the CJEU; in other news, Ireland plans to use its newly acquired Apple trial money to boost public spending
Amount B was top of the agenda at ITR’s US Transfer Pricing Forum 2024, while there were also heated discussions on the US’s potential adoption of pillar two
There will be an ‘unnecessary and burdensome compliance nightmare’ for small practices if the rules are not struck out, an Australian opposition politician told ITR