South Africa: CBC reporting in South Africa – new guidelines and practical challenges

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

South Africa: CBC reporting in South Africa – new guidelines and practical challenges

intl-updates-small.jpg

Multinational companies operating in South Africa are grappling with the practical challenges of the BEPS transfer pricing-related filing requirements.

South Africa is not an OECD member country, but as a member of the G20 has signed up to the minimum standards requirements under the OECD BEPS project. On September 29 2017, the South African Revenue Service (SARS) issued its final external business requirements specifications (BRS) on transfer pricing documentation following closely the OECD recommendations contained in BEPS Action 13. This much anticipated guide is intended to provide taxpayers with guidance on the level of documentation that should be prepared and the manner in which it must be submitted to the SARS.

Parent companies tax resident in South Africa will be required to prepare and lodge a master file which will likely be exchanged with other tax jurisdictions under the automatic exchange of information agreements (AEOI) or through an exchange of information request (EOIR). Action 13 also advocates the need for a more detailed local file to be completed for each jurisdiction in which the multinational has operations.

The above files will be submitted to the SARS in terms of section 25 of the Tax Administration Act (TAA). This provision already requires parent companies to complete and lodge the country-by-country report (CbCR) in respect of their global operations. Section 25 of the TAA governs the submission of tax returns and accompanying documentation.

The SARS has stated that the transactional threshold is lower for the master file and local file than for the CbCR. A multinational headquartered in South Africa only needs to lodge a CbCR where its consolidated group revenue exceeds ZAR 10 billion ($860.5 million). A master file and local file will have to be completed and lodged where the aggregate of the related party transactions exceeds ZAR 100 million. This aligns with the general documentation retention rules for transfer pricing contained in section 29 of the TAA.

Multinationals are struggling to meet these submission requirements, largely due to the late issuance of the BRS. As a result, the SARS has agreed to extend the deadline to February 28 2018 for the submission of the CbCR and master file for companies with a December year-end. Although the SARS has also issued a detailed guide on how to complete and submit the required documents, many multinationals headquartered in South Africa are facing practical challenges around submission of the reports. As an example, the files need to be filed through the SARS e-filing portal. The SARS imposes limitations on the size of documents that can be uploaded, which poses a practical problem. In addition, companies are not able to upload a completed CbCR as a standalone document but need to input the data into an online template which makes the process administratively cumbersome and prone to error. These and other administrative issues have been highlighted to the SARS. As South Africa adopts this international standard in line with the OECD member countries, it is hoped that the SARS technology will be adapted to support and not impede the required processes.

miller.jpg

Karen Miller

Karen Miller (karen.miller@webberwentzel.com)

Webber Wentzel

Website: www.webberwentzel.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

HMRC expects advisers to meet ever-higher compliance criteria. After 24 consecutive qualified audit opinions, many will ask whether HMRC should hold itself to the same standards
The purchase of Marosa represents the second major tax tech consolidation this week, raising questions of a broader industry trend
Peru’s approach to TP is increasingly at odds with OECD-style profitability policies, exposing multinational groups to asymmetric tax adjustments
Hany Elnaggar examines how the region's legacy economic substance regimes and the OECD's pillar two framework are converging on the same underlying test
The deals for TP Accurate and Intra Pricing Solutions will enhance Alphatax’s ability to support clients with the full TP lifecycle, the tax tech provider claimed
The DS Advocates partner discusses career reinvention, tax disputes and why advisory and litigation experience should complement one another
Lindsay Clayton’s arrival at Baker McKenzie continues the firm’s storied pursuit of ex-US government lawyers, a strategy reinforced by robust World Tax rankings
Shared transaction semantics, governed data and reusable ERP design may prove the most significant benefits of the UK's move to Peppol
As pillar two reshapes global tax competition, the UK faces a crucial challenge: how to remain attractive to multinationals without sacrificing tax revenues
Pillar two may be raising less than expected, but professor René Matteotti says the regime is still changing multinational tax behaviour
Gift this article