China: Inbound and outbound investment incentives kick off

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

China: Inbound and outbound investment incentives kick off

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
intl-updates

In the final days of 2017, the Chinese authorities set out a series of new incentives and improved tax treatments with a view to fostering both greater inbound and outbound investment in 2018. The Chinese Finance Minister, Mr Xiao Jie, also set out his plan of broader reforms for the medium term.

In terms of inbound incentives:

  • On December 28 2017, the State Administration of Taxation (SAT), the Ministry of Finance (MOF), and several other government departments, issued Circular 88. This sets out the details of a new incentive under which the withholding tax (WHT) imposed on dividends paid out of China (usually 10% before treaty relief) will be deferred where the dividends are reinvested in China by their foreign recipient. This incentive had first been signposted in the State Council Circular 39 in August 2017. The investments made must conform to certain requirements (including being made in 'encouraged industries'), and the incentive is applicable to investments made out of distributions made on and after January 1 2018.

In terms of outbound incentives:

  • On December 28 2017, the SAT and MOF issued Circular 84. This enhances the foreign tax credit (FTC) granted to Chinese tax resident enterprises in respect of foreign tax incurred on income which is also taxable in China. Specifically, where dividends are received from overseas enterprises, China previously (i) required that FTCs be calculated on a country-by-country basis (i.e. 'country baskets') and (ii) only permitted FTC to be granted for the 'underlying' corporate tax, incurred by overseas subsidiaries of the Chinese enterprise, down to three tiers of 'sub-subsidiaries'. Under Circular 84, (i) an election can be made so that the 'country baskets' do not apply, meaning that 'onshore pooling' of FTCs is possible, and (ii) FTCs for underlying tax are allowed down to five tiers of sub-subsidiaries.

  • On November 29 2017, the SAT issued Announcement 41. This clarifies the administrative rules governing FTC for overseas construction projects. Specifically, the clarifications facilitate Chinese constructing subcontractors and consortium members, conducting overseas construction work for general contractors/consortium leaders, to obtain FTC in China for foreign tax.

In terms of China tax reform plans for the medium term, the finance minister made the following clarifications in a People's Daily article published on December 20 2017.

  • Establishment of a new individual income tax (IIT) system. This would adopt a 'comprehensive taxation' approach (i.e. consolidated tax calculation and filing) for certain categories of income, such as salaries and wages, and independent service income, with the filing being made on an annual basis. These income types are taxed under separate tax calculations and filed monthly. At the same time, other income types such as dividends and interest, would continue to be taxed separately, at income type-specific IIT rates, as at present. These changes would be accompanied by enhanced IIT deductions, modifications to the IIT tax base, and improved collection mechanisms supported by a comprehensive national information system for personal income and property holdings.

  • The corporate income tax (CIT) system would continue to be enhanced, particularly for companies investing in the Belt and Road (BRI) countries, with a view to improving the competitiveness of the China tax system.

  • A real estate tax (RET) will be introduced, imposing an annual charge (based on assessed real estate value) on residential and business property holdings, while at the same time lessening tax burdens imposed on real estate construction and transfer.

  • Local taxation will continue to be reformed, and the division of tax revenues between central and local levels of government will be revised. VAT and consumption tax policies will be improved (with enhanced VAT export refunds on the cards). There will also be a push to put all tax laws on a statutory footing (i.e. passed as laws by the National People's Congress) by 2020. This will be accompanied by further conversion of various fees, charges, and other administrative impositions, into taxes on a statutory basis.

ho-khoonming.jpg

lu-lewis.jpg

Khoonming

Ho

Lewis Lu

Khoonming Ho (khoonming.ho@kpmg.com) and Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (10) 8508 7082 and +86 (21) 2212 3421

Website: www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR understands that UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce a consultation on the proposed financial reward scheme, which had left advisers fretting
The long-running dispute centres on Medtronic’s use of the comparable uncontrolled transaction TP method; in other news, Paul Hastings and FTI Consulting both made double tax hires
The boutique Australian firm’s TP award recognition proves that world-class advisory services aren’t limited to the ‘big four’, the firm’s founder tells ITR
Canadian and Indian dual VAT models have been a source of inspiration for the Brazilian model, but the latter has unique and innovative features, the OECD paper claimed
More sophisticated use of technology, heightened TP scrutiny and stricter filing requirements are making South African Revenue Service audits a formidable challenge
The hire of Doug Wick expands Baker McKenzie’s state and local tax practice and adds to the firm’s growing ex-IRS expertise
One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Gift this article