Poland: Tax exemption for new investments

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Tax exemption for new investments

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
intl-updates-small.jpg

From 1 July 2018, Poland became one special economic zone (SEZ) with extensive tax exemptions available. Since the early 90s, taxpayers have been able to benefit from public aid in the form of the income tax exemption that applies to profits earned in SEZs. Most of the exemptions resulted from qualifying expenses relating to new investments and increases in employment, but only within very specified locations.

Nowadays, taxpayers do not have to start or move their businesses to dedicated areas (SEZs) or ask to extend that area for the purpose of a given investment.

Under the new law, a taxpayer can apply for a decision granting tax exemption on profit derived from new investments. The decision remains valid for 10 years and cannot be extended beyond 15 years. The period depends on the region in which the new investment is to be made.

The decision will specify the period for which it is valid, as well as the scope of business within which the taxpayer may operate, and the conditions the taxpayer will have to meet in order to be entitled to the tax exemption. These include:

  • Number of employees and minimum employment period;

  • A minimum value of qualifying expenses and at the same time the maximum amount that will be taken into consideration when setting a limit for public aid;

  • The area in which the new investment is to be made; and

  • The deadline for fulfilling the new investment, after which the expenses will no longer qualify for public aid.

If the requirements mentioned in the decision ultimately are not met, the permit will be cancelled and the tax exemption abolished. The latter will have retroactive effect and the taxpayer will have to return all the public aid (the amount of the tax exemption) received under the decision.

Investors wishing to begin new business interests in Poland are strongly advised to take the new law into account, as the tax exemption available may substantially increase the rate of return of the investment.

In terms of the numbers involved: assuming that a large entrepreneur taxpayer makes an investment in a region where the public aid intensity is 35%, the limit for qualifying expenses is €40 million ($45.7 million). Thirty-five percent of that €40 million is public aid in the form of income tax exemption, which means, that taxable profit of up to around €74 million will be corporate income tax-exempt. Note that very large investments (more than €50 million) will be discussed individually.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article