International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia: Developments affecting offshore investors’ inbound investments

Sponsored by


There have been a number of important Australian tax developments recently that affect offshore businesses/investors and their inbound investments into Australia.

Exposure draft legislation affecting inbound investments

On May 17 2018, exposure draft legislation was released, setting out the details of the proposed integrity measures previously announced on March 27 2018. The proposed measures are:

  • Managed investment trusts (MITs) and stapled structures – Effective from July 1 2019, a 30% withholding tax (rather than 15%) would apply to distributions by a MIT to its qualifying foreign investors, where the distribution is sourced from active business income derived from:

  • A stapled structure comprising an asset entity (usually the MIT) and its stapled operating entity, with common ownership of 80% or more; or

  • A subsidiary trust or partnership carrying on or controlling an active trading business.

Exceptions and transitional rules are available, under which the concessionary 15% withholding tax rate could still apply to the MIT distributions. These include:

  • A 5% de minimis exception for MITs in a stapled structure;

  • A third-party rental income exception for MITs in a stapled structure;

  • A seven-year transitional period for certain arrangements committed to or existing before March 27 2018 (the announcement rate of these measures); and

  • A 15-year period for certain existing and new economic 'public interest' infrastructure assets costing A$500 million ($380 million) or more.

Details are yet to be released for the announced measure that would prevent MITs from investing in agricultural assets.

  • Thin capitalisation and 'double gearing' – Effective from July 1 2018, amendments to the safe harbour debt test and the arm's-length debt tests in the thin capitalisation rules. These changes are intended to prevent foreign investors from 'double gearing' their inbound investments via flow-through trusts or partnerships;

  • Foreign pension funds – Effective from July 1 2019, a limitation on the foreign pension fund withholding tax exception for interest and dividends to portfolio investments, i.e. where the fund has ownership interests of less than 10% and does not have influence over the target entity's key decision-making; and

  • Foreign sovereign investors – Effective from July 1 2019, legislation on the existing tax exemption for foreign sovereign investors (presently only an Australian Taxation Office (ATO) administrative concession), but limiting the exception to passive income from portfolio investments.

Anti-hybrid rules – legislation introduced into parliament

On May 24 2018, legislation for implementing the OECD's hybrid mismatch rules (BEPS Action 2) was introduced into the Australian federal parliament.

The legislation is broadly consistent with the exposure draft legislation previously released for public consultation, with expanded details (including on the integrity measures) and clarifications on the application dates of the rules – being from January 1 2019 or January 1 2020 for the 'imported mismatch rule'.

MAAL – draft tax determination

The ATO has released draft taxation determination TD 2018/D1.

The draft determination sets out the ATO's broad interpretation of one of the Multinational Anti-Avoidance Law (MAAL) conditions, namely what activities in Australia (performed by an Australian associate or dependent of a foreign entity) are regarded as 'directly in connection with' the foreign entity's supply of goods/services to Australian customers.

The draft determination also considers whether examples of the following activities can be caught by that condition:

  • Contributing to bringing about the contract for the supply;

  • Attracting new customers or maintaining existing customer relationships;

  • Relating to the ability to supply the goods/services, or the manner in which they are supplied;

  • Supporting the continuing execution of a sale under an existing sale arrangement; and

  • Procuring demand for sales.

Foreign resident capital gains tax (CGT) 'anti-churning' – draft ruling

The ATO has released draft law companion ruling LCR 2018/D3.

The draft ruling sets out the ATO's views on the 'anti-churning' measure and related examples.

Broadly, the anti-churning measure is an integrity measure that disallows an 'uplift' in asset tax cost bases when an entity joins an Australian income tax consolidated group, where a foreign resident:

  • Ceases to hold interests in that joining entity or its parent entity within 12 months before the joining time;

  • Does so without any triggering capital gains tax; and

  • Does so without a change in majority economic ownership of the joining entity.

Multinationals and foreign investors should consider the impact of these important measures on their inbound investments into Australia.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The winners of the ITR Europe, Middle East, and Africa Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
The winners of the ITR Asia-Pacific Tax Awards 2023 have been announced!
Mauro Faggion appeared cautiously optimistic as the European Commission waits to see whether all 27 member states will accept its proposal.
The global minimum rate also won’t entirely stop a race to the bottom, according to a tax director speaking at an ITR conference in London.
The country’s tax authorities are not interested in seeing transfer pricing studies any more, it was claimed at an ITR industry conference in London.
The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.