Hong Kong introduces an enhanced R&D tax incentive

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong introduces an enhanced R&D tax incentive

intl-updates

In a bid to encourage more research and development (R&D) activities being carried out in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong government has proposed a super R&D tax deduction which will commence from the year of assessment 2018/19, if enacted.

The bill contains complex and rather vague definitions as to which activities qualify for the super tax deduction.

Under existing rules, taxpayers only qualify for a 100% tax deduction on any R&D expenditure incurred to its business, subject to satisfying certain conditions. The R&D expenditure must be incurred in respect of R&D activities undertaken by the taxpayer itself or paid to an approved research institution.

The bill, however, broadly classifies R&D expenditure in two broad categories (Type A and Type B expenditures) that are deductible subject to meeting certain conditions. Type A qualifies for a basic 100% tax deduction. It is Type B expenditure that qualifies for the enhanced two-tiered tax deduction (300% tax deduction for the first HK$2 million ($255,000) and 200% for the remaining amount).

The critical element to qualify for Type B expenditure is that the R&D activity is wholly undertaken in Hong Kong and is one of the following:

  • An activity in the fields of natural or applied science to extend knowledge;

  • Any original and planned investigation undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or technical knowledge and understanding; or

  • The application of any research finding or other knowledge to a plan or design for producing or introducing new or substantially improved materials, devices, products, processes, systems or services before they are commercially produced or used.

However, the bill excludes certain activities from qualifying as Type B expenditure, including:

  • Any efficiency survey, feasibility study, management study, market research or sales promotion;

  • The application of any publicly available research findings or other knowledge to a plan or design, with an anticipated outcome and without any scientific or technological uncertainty;

  • Any activity that does not seek to directly contribute to achieving an advance in science or technology by resolving scientific or technological uncertainty; or

  • Any work to develop the non-scientific or non-technological aspect of a new or substantially improved material device, product, process, system or service.

In order for expenditure on a qualifying R&D activity to qualify for the super tax deduction, it must be incurred in relation to the taxpayer's business and must be:

  • Paid to a designated local research institution; or

  • Paid to a designated local research institution which has, as an object, the undertaking of a qualifying R&D activity related to the class of business to which the taxpayer's business belongs, where the payment is used for pursuing that object; or

  • An expenditure in relation to: (i) an employee engaged directly and actively in a qualifying R&D activity; or (ii) a consumable item that is used directly in a qualifying R&D activity.

Again, there are some key exclusions where no R&D deduction is allowed. This includes where the R&D expenditure is undertaken for another person, any rights generated from the R&D activity are not fully vested in the person, or the costs are met by the government or another person.

This is another welcome tax incentive that will provide Hong Kong with a competitive advantage in promoting R&D activities to be carried out in Hong Kong. There are, however, potentially onerous and complex conditions that need to be satisfied in order to qualify for the super tax deduction.

In our experience, many companies will find that they are conducting quality R&D activities as part of their product and process improvement activities. To ensure that they are in a position to claim the new benefit, it will be vital that they have the systems and processes in place to correctly identify projects and classify their R&D expenditure.

lu-lewis.jpg

ng

Lewis Lu

Curtis Ng




Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com) and Curtis Ng (curtis.ng@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

Website:www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
DLA Piper’s co-head of tax for the US and Latin America tells ITR about her fervent belief in equal access to the law, loving yoga, and paternal inspirations
Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
Gift this article