Hong Kong introduces an enhanced R&D tax incentive
International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong introduces an enhanced R&D tax incentive

intl-updates

In a bid to encourage more research and development (R&D) activities being carried out in Hong Kong, the Hong Kong government has proposed a super R&D tax deduction which will commence from the year of assessment 2018/19, if enacted.

The bill contains complex and rather vague definitions as to which activities qualify for the super tax deduction.

Under existing rules, taxpayers only qualify for a 100% tax deduction on any R&D expenditure incurred to its business, subject to satisfying certain conditions. The R&D expenditure must be incurred in respect of R&D activities undertaken by the taxpayer itself or paid to an approved research institution.

The bill, however, broadly classifies R&D expenditure in two broad categories (Type A and Type B expenditures) that are deductible subject to meeting certain conditions. Type A qualifies for a basic 100% tax deduction. It is Type B expenditure that qualifies for the enhanced two-tiered tax deduction (300% tax deduction for the first HK$2 million ($255,000) and 200% for the remaining amount).

The critical element to qualify for Type B expenditure is that the R&D activity is wholly undertaken in Hong Kong and is one of the following:

  • An activity in the fields of natural or applied science to extend knowledge;

  • Any original and planned investigation undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific or technical knowledge and understanding; or

  • The application of any research finding or other knowledge to a plan or design for producing or introducing new or substantially improved materials, devices, products, processes, systems or services before they are commercially produced or used.

However, the bill excludes certain activities from qualifying as Type B expenditure, including:

  • Any efficiency survey, feasibility study, management study, market research or sales promotion;

  • The application of any publicly available research findings or other knowledge to a plan or design, with an anticipated outcome and without any scientific or technological uncertainty;

  • Any activity that does not seek to directly contribute to achieving an advance in science or technology by resolving scientific or technological uncertainty; or

  • Any work to develop the non-scientific or non-technological aspect of a new or substantially improved material device, product, process, system or service.

In order for expenditure on a qualifying R&D activity to qualify for the super tax deduction, it must be incurred in relation to the taxpayer's business and must be:

  • Paid to a designated local research institution; or

  • Paid to a designated local research institution which has, as an object, the undertaking of a qualifying R&D activity related to the class of business to which the taxpayer's business belongs, where the payment is used for pursuing that object; or

  • An expenditure in relation to: (i) an employee engaged directly and actively in a qualifying R&D activity; or (ii) a consumable item that is used directly in a qualifying R&D activity.

Again, there are some key exclusions where no R&D deduction is allowed. This includes where the R&D expenditure is undertaken for another person, any rights generated from the R&D activity are not fully vested in the person, or the costs are met by the government or another person.

This is another welcome tax incentive that will provide Hong Kong with a competitive advantage in promoting R&D activities to be carried out in Hong Kong. There are, however, potentially onerous and complex conditions that need to be satisfied in order to qualify for the super tax deduction.

In our experience, many companies will find that they are conducting quality R&D activities as part of their product and process improvement activities. To ensure that they are in a position to claim the new benefit, it will be vital that they have the systems and processes in place to correctly identify projects and classify their R&D expenditure.

lu-lewis.jpg

ng

Lewis Lu

Curtis Ng




Lewis Lu (lewis.lu@kpmg.com) and Curtis Ng (curtis.ng@kpmg.com)

KPMG China

Tel: +86 (21) 2212 3421

Website:www.kpmg.com/cn

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The firm picked up awards for its work in multiple jurisdictions, while DLA Piper walked away with four individual honours
On a panel of advisers and tax authority representatives from a range of European jurisdictions, financial transactions were pinpointed as a key TP audit focus
ITR concludes its World Tax rankings analyses with APAC, where India’s dynamism stood out in an otherwise stable region
Jim Chalmers’ opposite number also criticised the embattled firm, but argued that the government’s response to the tax leaks scandal had gone too far
The firm’s new Asia-Pacific head James Badenach tells ITR that A&M Tax can provide an alternative in the region to a “constrained” ‘big four’
As the firm declined to speak with ITR over its progress, senator Deborah O’Neill branded PwC Australia’s recent parliamentary responses as ‘unsatisfactory’
A Swedish company’s CEO working part-time in Denmark led to a noteworthy PE decision; in other news, Latham & Watkins grew its London tax team
Rather than outright replace human intelligence, AI solutions can serve as the ‘infinite intern’ tax advisers need to automate onerous tasks, argues Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
The lack of provision for bilateral advance pricing agreements is a notable omission from proposed reforms of Brazil’s transfer pricing rules
Ursula von der Leyen is under pressure to ensure her new team makes competitiveness a top priority. How tax policy is designed and implemented is crucial, writes Ralph Cunningham
Gift this article