All material subject to strictly enforced copyright laws. © 2022 ITR is part of the Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC group.

Brazil addresses the establishment of joint and several tax liability

Sponsored by sponsored-firms-mattosfilho.png
Brazil Court - Large

Brazil's tax authorities may now establish liability of third parties before court judgement. Mattos Filho's Ana Paula S. Lui Barreto and Leonardo Fernandes Rebello discuss the impact to third parties and their defence.

Brazil’s Federal Revenue Office published normative instruction No. 1862 on December 28 2018, addressing the procedure for the establishment of joint and several tax responsibility, the situation where a taxpayer and third party may be jointly and severally liable for a tax obligation.

Among the novelties addressed, those related to the moment and procedure deserve more attention. According to the normative text, the tax authorities may now establish liability of third parties before judgment by the first instance and once the administrative proceeding is concluded, as well as in cases discussing tax compensation claims.

In this scenario, according to the text of the normative instruction, when the establishment of liability occurs during the tax administrative proceeding (before the first instance decision), and in cases of tax offsetting, the third parties may present their defenses according to the procedure established in Decree No. 70.235/72. In these cases, it is also possible to appeal to the Administrative Council of Tax Appeals (CARF).

In cases where such an establishment takes place after the conclusion of the tax administrative proceeding, the third party shall file a request for reconsideration to the same tax auditor who made the establishment. In case it is not upheld, the request may also be considered by the officer of the Internal Revenue Service unit and by the Regional Superintendent.

It is important to observe that these new procedures brought by the normative instruction challenge Article 142 of the Brazilian National Tax Code, which is express in assigning the tax authority to identify the taxpayer and the parties jointly and severally liable for the tax obligation through tax assessment notice (i.e not along or upon conclusion of the tax administrative procedure).

In cases where the establishment of liability is made after the conclusion of the tax administrative proceeding, and there is a clear violation of the right to contest, they will have to defend themselves through an internal procedure of the Brazilian Internal Revenue Service, and are not granted access to the procedure of Decree No. 70.235/72 (and to the judgment by the CARF, which is a technical and joint body council).  

Notwithstanding the considerations, normative instruction No. 1862/2018 also set forth provisions aimed at assigning more transparency to the taxpayers and to the administrative and judging authorities regarding the procedure for the establishment of joint and several tax liability.

As noted in Article 1, the Brazilian Internal Revenue Service explains that the tax liability established to a third party, who is not a taxpayer nor a tax substitute, presupposes the existence of a specific rule, and is different from the one that gives rise to the tax.

Furthermore, the normative opinion clarifies the requirements that must be included in the tax assessment notice in order to establish tax liability. These are qualification of the third party, description of the facts that give rise to the establishment of liability, and the legal classification and the delimitation of the tax credit to be ascribed to the responsible party.

In conclusion, the new rules regarding the establishment of joint and several tax liability after the issuance of the tax assessment notice, especially after the conclusion of the tax administrative proceeding, deserve attention since they challenge Article 142 of the Brazilian National Tax Code, and the right to contestation and a full defense of the responsible third parties.

On the other hand, it has also brought new rules that should assign more certainty regarding the procedure of establishing tax liability.

Barreto, Ana Paula S Lui

Ana Paula S. Lui Barreto

 

Fernandes Rebello, Leonardo

Leonardo Fernandes Rebello

This article was written by Ana Paula S. Lui Barreto and Leonardo Fernandes Rebello of Mattos Filho.

More from across our site

Japan reports a windfall from all types of taxes after the government revised its stimulus package. This could lead to greater corporate tax incentives for businesses.
Sources at Netflix, the European Commission and elsewhere consider the impact of incoming legislation to regulate tax advice in the EU – if it ever comes to pass.
This week European Commission officials consider legal loopholes to secure minimum corporate taxation, while Cisco and Microsoft shareholders call for tax transparency.
The fast-food company’s tax settlement with French authorities strengthens the need for businesses to review their TP arrangements and documentation.
The full ALP model will be adopted through a new TP regime, which is set to boost the country’s investments and tax certainty.
Tax professionals have called on the UK government to reconsider its online sales tax as it would affect the economy at the worst time.
Tax professionals have called on companies to act urgently to meet e-invoicing compliance targets as the EU plans to ramp up digitisation.
In the wake of India’s ambitious 25-year plan for economic growth, ITR has partnered with leading tax commentators to discuss what the future will look like for India and for the rest of the world.
But experts cast doubt on HMRC's data and believe COVID-19 would have increased the revenue shortfall.
EY’s plan to separate its auditing and consulting businesses might lessen scrutiny from global regulators, but the brand identity could suffer, say sources.
We use cookies to provide a personalized site experience.
By continuing to use & browse the site you agree to our Privacy Policy.
I agree