International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece amends century-old corporate laws

Sponsored by

 Some tax authorities are looking to audits as a means of replenishing depleted coffers

Law 4548/2018 (new law) on sociétés anonymes (SAs), or corporations in Greece, entered into force on January 1 2019, replacing Law 2190/1920, which governed the operations of corporations in Greece for almost one century.

Although Law 2190/1920 has been amended repeatedly, there were still many issues which needed to be revised, abolished or introduced in order to establish an efficient legal regime in line with the economic environment.

In light of this environment, the new law introduced a number of European directives, including EU Directive 2017/828 for the encouragement of long-term shareholder engagement, EU Directive 2013/34/EU on annual financial statements, EU Directive 2007/36/EC on the rights of shareholders of listed companies, and EU Directive 2017/1132, which relates to certain aspects of company law.

Furthermore, the new law clarified certain ambiguities regarding corporate practice. It confirmed that:

  • Share capital may be paid by offsetting claims of a (potential or existing) shareholder against the company;

  • A shareholders pre-emptive right may be abolished by a Board of Directors (BoD) resolution on certain conditions;

  • Third parties may attend general shareholders meetings on certain conditions; and

  • The share capital may be reduced and dividends may be paid in kind following valuation by a certified auditor.

Furthermore, the new law provides new types of titles that may be issued by a société anonyme, such as warrants and combined titles, while de-materialised shares may also be issued by non-listed SAs.

Bearer shares are also abolished and all shares must be registered, which is in line with the goals pursued by EU Directive 2015/849.

The minimum share capital is set at €25,000 ($28,000), while the minimum nominal share value has decreased from €0.30 to €0.04 in the interest of flexibility. The payment of the share capital must be verified by a certified auditor, although certain exceptions are provided (in which case the certification is made by the BoD).

It is further noted that any amounts deriving from the issuance of shares higher than the nominal value may be offset with losses from company losses (in certain conditions). However, they may not be distributed as dividends.

Furthermore, the new law clarified in detail what profit amounts may be distributed as dividends, in order to ensure that they correspond to realised profits as opposed to goodwill.

Finally, it is noted that issuance and/or partial transfer of a title (i.e. with only part of the rights incorporated), is prohibited without prejudice to joint rights, usufruct, pledge, and the transfer of autonomous proprietary rights (e.g. the right to dividends).

Overall, the New Law is a significant step toward efficiency, flexibility and modernisation of the legal regime of SAs, and is capable of contributing to the development of entrepreneurship and attraction of investment.

The views reflected in this article are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the global EY organization or its member firms.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The Canadian proprietor of Canary Wharf and Manhattan West faces accusations of avoiding tax through subsidiaries in Bermuda and beyond.
The Department of Finance Canada has put forward a package of transfer pricing reforms to clarify existing provisions and address what it says is a disproportionate loss of tax revenue.
Developments included the end of Saudi Arabia’s tax amnesty, Poland’s VAT battle with the EU, the Indirect Tax Forum, India’s WTO complaint, and more.
Charlotte Sallabank and Christy Wilson of Katten UK look at the Premier League's use of 'dual representation' contracts for tax matters.
Shareholders are set to vote on whether the asset management firm will adopt public CbCR, amid claims of tax avoidance.
US lawmakers averted a default on debt by approving the Fiscal Responsibility Act, but this deal may consolidate the Biden tax reforms rather than undermine them.
In a letter to the Australian Senate, the firm has provided the names of all 67 staff who received confidential emails but has not released them publicly.
David Pickstone and Anastasia Nourescu of Stewarts review the facts and implications of Ørsted’s appeal at the Upper Tribunal.
The Internal Revenue Service will lose the funding as part of the US debt limit deal, while Amazon UK reaps the benefits of the 130% ‘super-deduction’.
The European Commission wanted to make an example of US companies like Apple, but its crusade against ‘sweetheart’ tax rulings may be derailed at the CJEU.