Mumbai tribunal affirms territorial nexus as essential in determining attributable profits
International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mumbai tribunal affirms territorial nexus as essential in determining attributable profits

Sponsored by

logo.png
India map 600 x 375

The Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (tribunal) has held that a territorial nexus is necessary for determining profits attributable to operations carried out in India. Agency commission accrued, or arising, outside of India is not taxable under domestic laws.

Under the provisions of the Income-tax Act of 1961, income that has arisen directly or indirectly from a business connection is considered taxable in India. In business cases where not all operations are carried out in India, the income deemed taxable is considered 'reasonably attributable' to operations carried out in India. The applicability of this provision has been upheld in several judicial precedents.

In the case dealt with by the tribunal, the taxpayer is a foreign company (tax resident of Hong Kong) and is appointed by a television channel as an agent to:

  • Sell advertising air-time on the channels;

  • Distribute the channels in the territories where the channels are broadcast; and

  • Procure syndication revenues from the content on the channels.

In a particular year, the taxpayer earned agency commission on advertising services in India, as well as outside India. However, at that particular time, India did not have a tax treaty with Hong Kong.

It appears that the foreign company had a business connection in India and income attributable to the business operations. As a result, the taxpayer was compensated with an amount equal to the profit earned by the channel companies and overseas entities that had merged into an Indian group entity.

Profit attribution was determined on sound transfer pricing (TP) principles and by applying a global profitability percentage.

The tax authorities accepted the TP methodology and profit margin. However, the tax authorities made an adjustment on the amount taxable by the taxpayer (i.e. commission received towards services rendered outside India). It was also argued that under the Act, certain offshore income earned by a non-resident (i.e. by way of interest/royalty/fees for technical services) is taxable in India, irrespective of the place of rendition of the services or the presence of a business connection in India.

Subsequently, the tribunal rejected the position of the tax authorities. In this case, reliance on the provisions relating to the taxation of certain offshore income was not applicable to the agency commission earned by the taxpayer.

The tribunal held that the income taxable in India will only be part of the income as 'reasonably attributable' to the operations carried out in India. The income which could be said to be taxable in India should have a 'territorial nexus'.

Since the commission fee was paid to the taxpayer outside India for services rendered outside India, the tribunal held that it was not attributable to operations in India and hence not taxable in India.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Australian businessman Gordon Merchant used EY’s advice to offset an A$85 million capital gain, according to the Federal Court
Griggs has been drafted in ahead of schedule as the incumbent Tim Ryan departs for Citigroup; while the Netherlands plans to scrap a 15% share buyback tax
Authorities must ensure that Russian firms do not use transfer pricing schemes to increase profits made from oil sold in different markets, advocacy organisations have argued
Fallet, a partner at law firm Mauger Muniz Advogados in Brazil, tells ITR about his passion for tax law, the leaders who inspired him, and what makes tax cool
The former chief operating officer will assume the role on July 1
Ahead of next week's Indirect Tax Forum in London, ITR spoke with Christian Van Der Valk of Sovos about how different governments and companies are embracing e-invoicing
Konrad Jeczewski has alleged he was threatened with negative reviews before being made redundant by EY Australia
The suggestion was welcomed by Skadden’s European tax head at a special event on space and tax
A majority of clients – particularly high-earning businesses – want advisers with demonstrable social credentials, according to a survey of more than 28,000 corporate counsel
The training comes at a ‘critical time’ in the fight against tax criminals; in other news, Spanish prosecutors have dropped a tax fraud case against Shakira
Gift this article