International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mumbai tribunal affirms territorial nexus as essential in determining attributable profits

Sponsored by

India map 600 x 375

The Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (tribunal) has held that a territorial nexus is necessary for determining profits attributable to operations carried out in India. Agency commission accrued, or arising, outside of India is not taxable under domestic laws.

Under the provisions of the Income-tax Act of 1961, income that has arisen directly or indirectly from a business connection is considered taxable in India. In business cases where not all operations are carried out in India, the income deemed taxable is considered 'reasonably attributable' to operations carried out in India. The applicability of this provision has been upheld in several judicial precedents.

In the case dealt with by the tribunal, the taxpayer is a foreign company (tax resident of Hong Kong) and is appointed by a television channel as an agent to:

  • Sell advertising air-time on the channels;

  • Distribute the channels in the territories where the channels are broadcast; and

  • Procure syndication revenues from the content on the channels.

In a particular year, the taxpayer earned agency commission on advertising services in India, as well as outside India. However, at that particular time, India did not have a tax treaty with Hong Kong.

It appears that the foreign company had a business connection in India and income attributable to the business operations. As a result, the taxpayer was compensated with an amount equal to the profit earned by the channel companies and overseas entities that had merged into an Indian group entity.

Profit attribution was determined on sound transfer pricing (TP) principles and by applying a global profitability percentage.

The tax authorities accepted the TP methodology and profit margin. However, the tax authorities made an adjustment on the amount taxable by the taxpayer (i.e. commission received towards services rendered outside India). It was also argued that under the Act, certain offshore income earned by a non-resident (i.e. by way of interest/royalty/fees for technical services) is taxable in India, irrespective of the place of rendition of the services or the presence of a business connection in India.

Subsequently, the tribunal rejected the position of the tax authorities. In this case, reliance on the provisions relating to the taxation of certain offshore income was not applicable to the agency commission earned by the taxpayer.

The tribunal held that the income taxable in India will only be part of the income as 'reasonably attributable' to the operations carried out in India. The income which could be said to be taxable in India should have a 'territorial nexus'.

Since the commission fee was paid to the taxpayer outside India for services rendered outside India, the tribunal held that it was not attributable to operations in India and hence not taxable in India.

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the EU’s BEFIT initiative and wider tax reforms in the bloc.
COVID-19 and an overworked HMRC may have created the ‘perfect storm’ for reduced prosecutions, according to tax professionals.
Participants in the consultation on the UN secretary-general’s report into international tax cooperation are divided – some believe UN-led structures are the way forward, while others want to improve existing ones. Ralph Cunningham reports.
The German government unveils plans to implement pillar two, while EY is reportedly still divided over ‘Project Everest’.
With the M&A market booming, ITR has partnered with correspondents from firms around the globe to provide a guide to the deal structures being employed and tax authorities' responses.
Xing Hu, partner at Hui Ye Law Firm in Shanghai, looks at the implications of the US Uyghur Forced Labor Protection Act for TP comparability analysis of China.
Karl Berlin talks to Josh White about meeting the Fair Tax standard, the changing burden of country-by-country reporting, and how windfall taxes may hit renewable energy.
Sandy Markwick, head of the Tax Director Network (TDN) at Winmark, looks at the challenges of global mobility for tax management.
Taxpayers should look beyond the headline criteria of the simplification regime to ensure that their arrangements meet the arm’s-length standard, say Alejandro Ces and Mark Seddon of the EY New Zealand transfer pricing team.
In a recent webinar hosted by law firms Greenberg Traurig and Clayton Utz, officials at the IRS and ATO outlined their visions for 2023.