International Tax Review is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Poland: Poland widens definition of related parties

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-mddp.png
sunflower-2881039-1280.jpg

Polish taxpayers will be able to apply new criteria to determine whether parties are related or not for tax purposes from 2019.

Polish taxpayers will be able to apply new criteria to determine whether parties are related or not for tax purposes from 2019. The new definition of "related parties" has been extended to include "significant influence".

The outcome may influence not only the scope of transfer pricing (TP) documentation, but also the tax deductible cost of group charges.

Transfer pricing regulations in Poland have been much stricter than elsewhere in Europe for many years. In most cases in Europe, only capital relations are reviewed while analysing arm's-length prices.

Until the end of 2018, Polish taxpayers were obliged to identify related parties not only based on capital relations (level of direct or indirect shares at 25%, and 5% until the end of 2016), but also in respect to control, management and family relations.

The new, wider definition seeks to include situations where structures are established in capital groups involving an investment fund, for instance, or a foundation or ownership structure specifically modeled on relations.

The idea of exerting "significant influence" is recognised if an individual has the actual ability to influence key business decisions of an entity.

In this respect, relations can also be identified in cases where a person has no formal authority or control in the government of an entity (e.g. at the board of directors or supervisory board level, for instance), and may significantly influence the strategic economic decisions made by the entity.

Examples stated by the legislator include making a decision to abandon a part of a business activity, implementing a new product in the market, taking over a part of a business from a related entity, and influencing the pricing strategy.

Therefore, "significant influence" can be identified in the case of an individual who could have a significant impact on the TP of an entity. The significant impact also exists in the case of family relations (being married, kinship, affinity, or second-degree affinity).

In practice, identifying a relation triggered by "significant influence" could be very challenging, cost-intensive and time-consuming for each organisation, particularly regarding cases featuring many departments.

For example, a number of entities that dispose of employees engaged in making business decisions, or cooperation with subcontractors, or those engaged in negotiations in business agreements, can face a dilemma regarding whether such employees could trigger relations with a subcontractor, for instance.

The new approach employed by tax administrations in new contexts remains to be seen.

In this respect, taxpayers in Poland should pay close attention to fulfilling all TP reporting obligations, and when making tax deductions on a related party's charges.

Transactions exceeding circa €690,000 ($790,000) per year are tax deductible only up to €690,000 + 5% earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amoritisation (EBITDA).

more across site & bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Mauro Faggion appeared cautiously optimistic as the European Commission waits to see whether all 27 member states will accept its proposal.
The global minimum rate also won’t entirely stop a race to the bottom, according to a tax director speaking at an ITR conference in London.
The country’s tax authorities are not interested in seeing transfer pricing studies any more, it was claimed at an ITR industry conference in London.
The controversial measure is being watered down after criticism from the European Central Bank.
More than 600 such requests were made in 2022, while HMRC has also bolstered its fraud service, it has been revealed.
The General Court reverses its position taken four years ago, while the UN discusses tax policy in New York.
Discussion on amount B under the first part of the OECD's two-pronged approach to international tax reform is far from over, if the latest consultation is anything go by.
Pillar two might be top of mind for many multinational companies, but the huge variations between countries’ readiness means getting ahead of the game now, argues Russell Gammon, chief solutions officer at Tax Systems.
ITR’s latest quarterly PDF is going live today, leading on the looming battle between the UN and the OECD for dominance in global tax policy.
Company tax changes are central to the German government’s plan to revive the economy, but sources say they miss the mark. Ralph Cunningham reports.