A closer look at the Shell Energy decision and recent reforms in Australia

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A closer look at the Shell Energy decision and recent reforms in Australia

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
On January 25 2022 the Full Federal Court handed down the Shell Energy decision

Jock McCormack of DLA Piper discusses the recent Full Federal Court decision in the Shell Energy Holdings Australia Ltd case, and summarises recent legislative reforms affecting alternative investments and patents.

On January 25 2022 the Full Federal Court handed down its decision on the deductibility of certain exploration costs and related tax issues.

The decision dealt specifically with the tax treatment of the acquisition of additional proportional interests in exploration permits and retention leases (i.e. statutory titles) by Shell from Chevron in relation to the Browse offshore petroleum project.

Most importantly, the court unanimously held that ‘exploration’ encompasses all activities directed towards investigating the commercial recoverability of the petroleum, and not just discovery activities/costs.

The case dealt, among other things, with the distinction between ‘exploration’ and ‘development’ activities under domestic Australian tax and other regulatory laws – but mainly under the tax law, i.e. section 40-80 of the 1997 Tax Act.

The case also held that the ‘first use’ of the relevant assets was ‘immediately upon acquisition’, that is when these assets were held ready for use. Shell was therefore entitled to an outright deduction under Australian law.

New CIIV regime

The new Australian corporate collective investment vehicles (CCIV) regime passed through Parliament in early February and will be operative from July 1 2022.

The new CCIV regime will provide an alternative investment vehicle largely similar to and aligned with the existing attribution management investment trust regime. However, it will be a corporate rather than a trust structure.

It will provide a new ‘flow-through’ vehicle for tax purposes and will allow various flexibilities including facilitating sub-funds of the CCIV to provide different products and pursue different investment strategies.

The regime is intended to be linked to the Asia Regional Funds Passport and allow a potential listing of a retail CCIV.

New patent box regime

On February 10 2022, a new bill was introduced into the Australian Parliament containing the proposed patent box regime in Division 357 of the 1997 Tax Act.

The new regime will apply to patents related to the Australian medical and biotechnology industries and will provide an incentive for businesses to undertake their research and development  and to commercialise their patented inventions in Australia.

An effective taxation rate of 17% will apply to certain income attributable to eligible patented inventions in Australia.

While the proposed regime will apply to eligible medical or biotechnology patents linked to therapeutic goods included in the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods, it may in the future be extended to patents associated with low emissions and clean energy technologies.

The bill containing the new regime is expected to be debated and passed by the Australian Parliament in the coming months with a view to being operative in respect of income years commencing on or after July 1 2022. This means it will apply to eligible patents granted or issued after May 11 2021.

 

 

Jock McCormackPartner, DLA Piper AustraliaE: jock.mccormack@dlapiper.com  

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article