Australia evaluates impact of COVID-19 on transfer pricing

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia evaluates impact of COVID-19 on transfer pricing

Sponsored by

Sponsored_Firms_piper.png
Australia reacts to changes driven by the economic impact of the pandemic

Eddie Ahn of DLA Piper discusses how the Australian government has moved to assist business and taxpayers affected by the coronavirus outbreak.

On June 19 2020, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released guidance on its approach to the potential impacts of COVID-19 on transfer pricing arrangements, to assist taxpayers in preparing their transfer pricing documentation. Some of the key points raised by the ATO included:

  • Emphasis will be placed on taxpayers gathering sufficient evidence to support any changes to, or impacts on, business as a result of COVID-19, including to the functions, assets or risks of any Australian entities.

  • The ATO acknowledges that an analysis of comparables may not reliably support arm’s-length outcomes, due to the impact of COVID-19, particularly in the short term. As such, the ATO may seek to understand the financial outcomes that would have been achieved by taxpayers ‘but for’ the impact on COVID-19.

  • At this time, there are no proposed changes to the profit markers in Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2019/1 due to COVID-19. This PCG outlines the ATO’s approach to assess risk ratings for Australian inbound distributor arrangements, based on profit margins and functional profile.

  • The ATO also notes that existing and in progress APAs may be adversely impacted by COVID-19 and will seek to engage with taxpayers to resolve any issues.


In addition, the ATO issued a statement that it was aware of taxpayers seeking to review or restructure their related party arrangements in light of COVID-19. The ATO flagged that it will review such changes to related party arrangements where they are driven by tax advantages, such as avoiding withholding tax or reducing assessable income from overseas-related parties. In particular, the ATO states that it will review such arrangements from a transfer pricing perspective, to assess whether independent parties dealing wholly independently in comparable circumstances would have mutually agreed to such changes to the existing related party arrangements.




On July 15 2020, the ATO also released guidance on the treatment of JobKeeper payments in transfer pricing arrangements. The JobKeeper regime is an Australian government programme designed to assist Australian businesses affected by COVID-19 pandemic, principally by subsidising wages of their employees. The ATO states that it will seek to review arrangements where the JobKeeper payment has resulted in a change to the transfer price received by an Australian entity (for example, where it is taken into account in determining a cost-plus margin).

Australia adopts OECD 2017 transfer pricing guidelines

The Australian transfer pricing legislation has been formally amended to include the revised OECD 2017 Transfer Pricing Guidelines as guidance that may be used to determine the application of the Australian transfer pricing rules (previously these provisions referred to the 2010 Transfer Pricing Guidelines). These amendments have retrospective effect from July 1 2017.




These amendments bring Australia’s transfer pricing rules up to date with the latest OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines and may potentially be further updated to include more recent OECD transfer pricing guidance, including those in respect of financial transactions.

New South Wales flags potential major tax reform

On July 1, the State Government of New South Wales (NSW), Australia’s most populous state, released a draft report of the review of Federal Financial Relations, which recommended major state tax reform. Some of the key potential measures recommended in the report included:


  • Replacing property stamp duty with a broad-based land tax;

  • Replacing all specific taxes on insurance policies with broad-based taxes;

  • A national unified approach to payroll tax; and

  • Agreeing on options for increasing the good and service tax (GST) rate and/or expanding the base of the GST.


The recommendations in the report were mainly driven by the economic impact of COVID-19 and also by a broader review of the financial relations and taxing rights of the Federal and State Governments of Australia, following 20 years from when GST was first introduced into Australia. While still in draft and open for public consultation, the report flags potential significant reforms to state taxation in Australia, which may be adopted within NSW and more broadly across Australia, especially in light of economic conditions.

Eddie Ahn

T: +61 2 9286 8268

E: eddie.ahn@dlapiper.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK’s Labour government has an unpopular prime minister, an unpopular chancellor and not a lot of good options as it prepares to deliver its autumn Budget
Awards
The firms picked up five major awards between them at a gala ceremony held at New York’s prestigious Metropolitan Club
The streaming company’s operating income was $400m below expectations following the dispute; in other news, the OECD has released updates for 25 TP country profiles
Software company Oracle has won the right to have its A$250m dispute with the ATO stayed, paving the way for a mutual agreement procedure
If the US doesn't participate in pillar two then global consensus on the project can’t be a reality, tax academic René Matteotti also suggests
If it gets pillar two right, India may be the ideal country that finds a balance between its global commitments and its national interests, Sameer Sharma argues
As World Tax unveils its much-anticipated rankings for 2026, we focus on EMEA’s top performers in the first of three regional analyses
Firms are spending serious money to expand their tax advisory practices internationally – this proves that the tax practice is no mere sideshow
The controversial deal would ‘preserve the gains achieved under pillar two’, the OECD said; in other news, HMRC outlined its approach to dealing with ‘harmful’ tax advisers
Former EY and Deloitte tax specialists will staff the new operation, which provides the firm with new offices in Tokyo and Osaka
Gift this article