Hong Kong SAR: Relief measures are tax-exempt under the anti-epidemic fund

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong SAR: Relief measures are tax-exempt under the anti-epidemic fund

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
coronavirus-4917124-1920.jpg

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG analyse the tax exemptions provided on subsidies and financial assistance granted under the anti-epidemic fund.

The Hong Kong SAR government issued ‘The Exemption from Salaries Tax and Profits Tax (anti-epidemic fund) Order’ (order) on May 27 2020 following the release of substantial stimulus packages to support businesses and individuals adversely impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak. 

The order took effect on May 29 2020 and applies from the year of assessment 2019/2020. The order provides tax exemptions for most of the subsidies and financial assistance granted under the anti-epidemic fund (AEF) to businesses and individuals. 

Key features

Beneficiaries of the assistance granted under the AEF will be exempt from profits tax and salaries tax unless “the sums are paid for general business activities and are not paid in a matching arrangement”. Most of the key supporters for businesses such as the employment support scheme (ESS) are covered by the tax exemption. A summary of the proposed tax treatment for the two rounds of measures under the AEF can be found online.




The same principles will be adopted to provide tax exemptions as and when further relief measures are rolled out under the AEF.



In respect of the 2019/20 tax returns:

  • Employers and employees do not need to report the sums exempted in the tax returns upon commencement of the order; and

  • Businesses or individuals who have already filed their tax returns can submit written notifications to Hong Kong SAR’s Inland Revenue Department (IRD) to amend the relevant information. Employers should file revised employer’s return(s) for the relevant employee(s), if applicable.


Commercial response

Businesses welcome this much awaited confirmation of the tax treatment of the financial assistance granted under the AEF. The granting of tax exemptions for most of the relief measures, including the ESS, further alleviate the financial burden of industries, businesses and individuals impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak. 




However, while tax remains an important consideration, businesses should not lose sight of other factors, such as long-term business plans, when assessing their eligibility for the relief measures.



From a tax return filing perspective, businesses or individuals who have previously included the subsidies received under the AEF as taxable income in their tax returns should seek to amend these tax returns. Businesses should consult their local tax advisors on the implications of receiving tax exempt subsidies when preparing or revising tax returns for submission to the IRD.



Lewis Lu

T: +86 10 8508 5002

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com



John Timpany

T: +852 2143 8790

E: john.timpany@kpmg.com



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two is certain to be a game-changer for tax advisers and their clients. Russell Gammon of Tax Systems outlines 10 reasons why
Despite a general decline in corporate tax rates around the world, jurisdictions are now more reliant on it than in 1990, a Tax Foundation economist found
Australian law firm Webb Henderson’s report said PwC had met 46 of 47 targets; in other news, the OECD has issued new transfer pricing country profiles
The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
Gift this article