Hong Kong SAR: Relief measures are tax-exempt under the anti-epidemic fund

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong SAR: Relief measures are tax-exempt under the anti-epidemic fund

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-kpmg.png
coronavirus-4917124-1920.jpg

Lewis Lu and John Timpany of KPMG analyse the tax exemptions provided on subsidies and financial assistance granted under the anti-epidemic fund.

The Hong Kong SAR government issued ‘The Exemption from Salaries Tax and Profits Tax (anti-epidemic fund) Order’ (order) on May 27 2020 following the release of substantial stimulus packages to support businesses and individuals adversely impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak. 

The order took effect on May 29 2020 and applies from the year of assessment 2019/2020. The order provides tax exemptions for most of the subsidies and financial assistance granted under the anti-epidemic fund (AEF) to businesses and individuals. 

Key features

Beneficiaries of the assistance granted under the AEF will be exempt from profits tax and salaries tax unless “the sums are paid for general business activities and are not paid in a matching arrangement”. Most of the key supporters for businesses such as the employment support scheme (ESS) are covered by the tax exemption. A summary of the proposed tax treatment for the two rounds of measures under the AEF can be found online.




The same principles will be adopted to provide tax exemptions as and when further relief measures are rolled out under the AEF.



In respect of the 2019/20 tax returns:

  • Employers and employees do not need to report the sums exempted in the tax returns upon commencement of the order; and

  • Businesses or individuals who have already filed their tax returns can submit written notifications to Hong Kong SAR’s Inland Revenue Department (IRD) to amend the relevant information. Employers should file revised employer’s return(s) for the relevant employee(s), if applicable.


Commercial response

Businesses welcome this much awaited confirmation of the tax treatment of the financial assistance granted under the AEF. The granting of tax exemptions for most of the relief measures, including the ESS, further alleviate the financial burden of industries, businesses and individuals impacted by the COVID-19 outbreak. 




However, while tax remains an important consideration, businesses should not lose sight of other factors, such as long-term business plans, when assessing their eligibility for the relief measures.



From a tax return filing perspective, businesses or individuals who have previously included the subsidies received under the AEF as taxable income in their tax returns should seek to amend these tax returns. Businesses should consult their local tax advisors on the implications of receiving tax exempt subsidies when preparing or revising tax returns for submission to the IRD.



Lewis Lu

T: +86 10 8508 5002

E: lewis.lu@kpmg.com



John Timpany

T: +852 2143 8790

E: john.timpany@kpmg.com



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
She will formally take over the leadership of the private client firm in July next year, succeeding the veteran Margaret Robertson
Turley will succeed the veteran Grant Wardell-Johnson on Wednesday, October 1
Gift this article