Romania: Is there a better time to ask for a VAT refund?

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Romania: Is there a better time to ask for a VAT refund?

Sponsored by

EY_Logo_Beam_STFWC_Horizontal_Large_RGB_OffBlack_Yellow_EN.gif
Tax authorities have relaxed rules as a result of the pandemic

Alex Milcev and Costin Manta of EY Romania explain how tax authorities have relaxed conditions for granting VAT refunds in order to boost liquidity.

Companies facing VAT refund positions are trapped between the need of cash, especially during this period, and the stress of having to go through a VAT audit. A selected few companies were eligible for a quick VAT refund (e.g. large and midsized taxpayers with a low tax risk), receiving their money back before a VAT audit was performed, thus granting them quick access to the much-needed cash.



The economic environment during the COVID-19 pandemic has determined the tax authorities to relax the conditions for granting the VAT refund, in an effort to secure liquidity on the market. Many of the companies who did not qualify for the simplified procedure, do qualify now. There are some simple criteria, such as companies who have a clean tax record, as well as small companies who are not at their first VAT refund request or did not carry forward the refundable VAT for more than 12 months. Such companies are eligible to get their refund with a subsequent VAT audit (not with a prior one, as the general rule was before the pandemic). The validity of this facility lasts during the state of emergency and 30 days after (up to June 13 2020). Companies facing a VAT refund position are in the best position to request their money back.



One of the most frequent excuses for not requesting the refund is that the tax authorities will perform a VAT audit. Under the current context, it is likely that most companies will not have to go through a VAT audit immediately, as they will first be approved the refund and afterwards the tax authorities will decide if an audit is necessary. It is not certain an audit will be performed at all, as this will depend on a risk analysis. If the high level explanations provided to the tax authorities during the risk analysis process are convincing enough, the refund may not trigger an audit at all.



What if a company expects that they will be assessed additional tax liabilities during a tax audit?



If companies are aware of potential additional tax liabilities to be assessed by the tax authorities, it is also a good time to make the necessary corrections. The taxpayer has the option to make any correction voluntarily in its tax statements until December 15 2020 without having to pay late payment charges (which can go up to 36.5% per year). This can be done thanks to the tax amnesty in force. 



Thus, taxpayers can pay any tax liabilities which were due up to March 31 2020 without additional costs, such as late payment interest or late payment penalty. If these corrections are made voluntarily, the risks for the Romanian tax authorities to assess additional late payment charges during a future VAT audit significantly decrease.



Can we include the VAT related to bad debts in the VAT refund request?



Although the refund positions are usually triggered by large investments or applying the zero-rated VAT exemptions on the supplies, reversing the VAT incurred in relation to bad debts can also be a trigger for a refund position.



Thus, in the current context available only for a short period of time, it may be worthwhile to also include in the refund request the VAT related to bad debts, given the expected quick turnaround.

This window of opportunity closes within approximately three weeks, so it may be the time to act. By the time this opportunity closes, the April and May VAT returns could be submitted, asking the VAT refund.

Alex Milcev

E: alex.milcev@ro.ey.com



Costin Manta

E: costin.manta@ro.ey.com



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article