New bill proposes the creation of a digital services tax in Brazil

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New bill proposes the creation of a digital services tax in Brazil

Sponsored by

logo.png
donald-giannatti-wj1d-qiosee-unsplash.jpg

Ricardo Marletti Debatin da Silveira and Rogério Gaspari Coelho of Machado Associados discuss the recent bill aimed at creating a digital service tax for large multinational technology companies in Brazil.

On May 4 2020, congressman João Maia filed Bill No. 2358/2020 with the Chamber of Deputies, aiming at instituting a ‘contribution for the intervention in the economic domain’ named CIDE-Digital. The bill invokes base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) Action 1, about the challenges of the digital economy, to propose the creation of this digital service tax (DST), assuming that the revenues of big multinational technology companies are undertaxed in Brazil. 

While there are other bills aiming at instituting a DST by including that possibility on the Brazilian Federal Constitution, Bill No. 2358/2020 proposes the complete design of this form of tax. 



The CIDE-Digital would be levied on the gross revenues of digital services rendered by ‘big technology companies’, which the bill classifies as companies domiciled in Brazil or abroad, whose economic group earns gross revenues higher than BRL 3 billion globally and, cumulatively, BRL 100 million in the country. This rule shows a clear intention of taxing international groups and not pure domestic companies.



The amounts collected will be directed to the National Fund of Scientific and Technological Development (FNDTC). 



The tax triggering events would be the earning of gross revenues from the following activities: (i) running advertising in digital platforms for users located in Brazil; (ii) providing a digital platform where users can get in touch and interact, with the objective of selling goods or services, as long as one of them is located in Brazil; and (iii) transmitting data of users located in Brazil and collected during the use of a digital platform or generated by those users. The location of the users in Brazil would be generally checked by their internet protocol (IP) addresses.



The bill establishes progressive rates: 1% for revenues up to BRL 150 million; 3% for revenues exceeding BRL 150 million and up to BRL 300 million; and 5% for revenues above BRL 300 million. Only the proportion of revenues related to the users located in Brazil will be considered for the levy of the CIDE-Digital, in the case of companies that earn revenues in multiple jurisdictions.



As mentioned, the bill defines that companies domiciled abroad will also be taxpayers of the CIDE-Digital, but it does not define how to collect the tax from the companies without physical presence in Brazil. The bill grants general powers to the Federal Revenue Service to manage, audit, collect and establish the ancillary obligations, but it does not address one of the most difficult aspects of the implementation of the DST worldwide: how to properly and efficiently tax foreign tech players? 



Although the digital taxation is a worldwide necessity and tendency – which has already been introduced by several OECD members – for the multinational players already established in Brazil, this new tax would add some more spice to the challenging task of doing business in this huge (and highly taxed) market. 

_______________________________________________

Note: USD 1.00 = BRL 5.60 (May 21 2020) 





Ricardo Marletti Debatin da Silveira

T: +55 11 3819 4855

E: rms@machadoassociados.com.br



Rogério Gaspari Coelho 

T: +55 11 3819 4855

E: rgc@machadoassociados.com.br 



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
The US president has raised India’s tariff rate to 50% because of its importation of Russian oil; in other news, firms made key international tax partner hires
Tax auditors themselves had not been aware of the new TP ‘transaction matrix’ requirements, ITR hears as five German partners share their client experiences
Gift this article