Regional development contributions in Chile: Modifying investment projects

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Regional development contributions in Chile: Modifying investment projects

Sponsored by

sponsored-firms-pwc.png
The regional development contribution has introduced a fresh challenge

Astrid Schudeck and Rafaela Moreno of PwC Chile evaluate the tax implications arising from the introduction of regional development contributions as a part of the Chilean tax reform.

On February 24 2020, a new Chilean tax reform was enacted introducing several modifications to the current system, among which, a regional development contribution was introduced. This contribution will be an important tax consideration when investing in the construction, mining and industrial sectors.

The new regional development contribution levies taxpayers subject to the First Category Tax, performing investment projects in Chile which imply (i) the acquisition, construction or imports of fixed assets for an amount equal or greater than $10 million and (ii) the need to go under the environmental impact evaluation system (SEIA).

Projects subject to the SEIA are established in Article 10 of Law No. 19,300, and include, under certain conditions, aqueducts, electric high-voltage transmission lines and substations, airports, highways, industrial projects, among several others.

In respect to the specific features of this contribution, it is important to consider that the investment on these kind of projects, when applicable, will be subject to a one-time 1% tax rate on the amount surpassing the $10 million over the acquisition value of all fixed assets of one same investment project. This must be understood as the group of structures and facilities where the fixed assets are located and that due to the nature of the project, constitute part of a coherent commercial and geographical unit. The tax base will consider the amount of all the fixed assets comprehended in the project, considered their value as a whole (i.e. not individually), when such is over the $10 million.

The regional development contribution however presents many uncertainties.

Firstly, the tax reform provides an exemption for investment projects in the health, education, science, technological investigation and development, and home and office construction areas. Nevertheless, it seems that the exemption is not automatically applicable, as the taxpayer needs to have a specific resolution from the Finance Ministry granting the exemption. We expect that the Finance Ministry will provide for an expedition process for obtaining it.

On the other hand, it becomes clear that new projects which must undergo the SEIA and comply with the $10 million requirement are subject to this new contribution. Nevertheless, projects already constructed present some interesting questions.

The new provisions establish that the contribution will not apply over substitutions or replacements of fixed assets, unless it implies a project amplification which must go under a new SEIA. However, the wording of the tax reform does not provide a definition for the concepts of substitution or replacement, nor is it resolved if the modification by itself should surpass the $10 million or if the amount of the project as a whole will be considered – particularly in the case of existing projects before the tax reform entered into force.

It will also be important that Chilean Internal Revenue Service (IRS) confirms that the contribution paid may be deductible from the taxable income of taxpayers subject to such.

All of these specifications are of utmost importance for Chilean established companies or investors to consider a 1% extra cost on their projects, not only the new ones but also the ones which will undergo maintenance, replacements, upgrades or other similar process in order to continue with business activities. 





Astrid Schudeck

E: astrid.schudeck@cl.pwc.com



Rafaela Moreno

E: rafaela.moreno@pwc.com



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax expert Craig Hillier agrees with the comparison of pillar two to using a sledgehammer to crack a nut
The amount is reported to be up 57% from the £5.6bn that the UK tax agency believes was underpaid in the previous year
The US president also unveiled a new 50% levy on copper imports; in other news, a UK wealth tax proposal has been criticised by the Institute for Fiscal Studies
Wim Wuyts, who had been head of the specialist tax network since 2017, is moving on to a new role with WTS’s Belgian member firm
MNEs are increasingly using algorithmic tools in TP. Sahasranshu Dash argues that data ethics should therefore plug directly into the TP design process
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales also queried whether HMRC resources could be better spent scrutinising larger entities
Grant Thornton’s Austria tax head likens his practice to an escape room, shares his football coaching ambitions, and explains why tax is cool
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 EMEA Tax Awards
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Asia-Pacific Tax Awards
The fates of pillars one and two hang in the balance after the US successfully threw its weight around in G7 and Canadian negotiations
Gift this article