Transfer pricing and double taxation: Italy’s downward adjustment procedure

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Transfer pricing and double taxation: Italy’s downward adjustment procedure

Venice large

The Italian Revenue Agency issued new rules regarding the requirements and procedure for the pursuit of downward adjustment of taxable income. TP Week’s Italy correspondents Antonella Della Rovere and Federico Vincenti of Crowe Valente / Valente Associati GEB Partners explain the new provision.

The new rules (regulation - Provvedimento 108954/2018) were issued on 30 May 2018, following a public consultation launched in February 2018.

The new regulation follows the amendments introduced in 2017 for Italian transfer pricing rules. Such amendments provided for an extended taxpayer’s right to request downward adjustment in connection with the correct application of the arm’s-length principle.

In particular, downward adjustment of income taxable in Italy may now be pursued in the following cases:

a)   Mutual agreement between Italian and foreign tax authorities following mutual agreement procedure (MAP) either under a double tax convention (DTC) or under the EU Arbitration Convention no. 436/90/CEE;

b)   Joint audit in the context of international administrative cooperation;

c)    Taxpayer’s application in view of a definitive upward adjustment following application of the arm’s-length principle in another state.

In this respect, the new regulation illustrates:

  • The requirements for the submission of a request for downwards adjustment in Italy;

  • The relevant procedure.

The request may be submitted by Italian residents in view of (i) a definitive upwards adjustment of their taxable income (ii) following application of the arm’s- length principle (iii) in a foreign state which has a DTC in force with Italy and allows for effective exchange of information.

Such request is submitted to the International Office for Preventive Agreements and Disputes of the Italian Revenue Agency. It should necessarily indicate the specific legal instrument for resolution of international disputes to be activated, i.e. MAP under a DTC or under the EU Arbitration Convention or under other legal framework.

Under penalty of inadmissibility, the deadlines stipulated in such legal instrument should be complied with and the request should include the information necessary for the activation of such instrument. In any case, the request must:

  • Indicate the subject-matter clearly, i.e. the request for elimination of double taxation generated by a definitive upwards adjustment following application of the arm’s-length principle in a foreign state. If the above adjustment is still not definitive on the date of submission, this should be indicated along with the conditions for the adjustment to become definitive;

  • Include translation in Italian (or in English) of the foreign tax assessment from which the upward adjustment arises;

  • Indicate all factual and legal circumstances necessary to evaluate the upwards adjustment, under the arm’s-length principle;

  • Be signed by the legal representative of the requesting entity or another person with power of representation.

From a procedural point of view, the competent authority shall declare the request admissible within 30 days by virtue of respective notification to the taxpayer. In the same timeframe, the competent authority shall notify the taxpayer of the lack of any information necessary, as above, granting 30 days to provide it. If the lack of information is not remedied promptly, the request shall be rejected as inadmissible.

 The procedure should be concluded within 180 days from the receipt of the request by virtue of a reasoned act of acceptance or rejection. In case of acceptance, the competent authority shall communicate to the tax authority of the foreign state the recognition of the downward adjustment. Following receipt of the foreign tax certificate (or equivalent document) of the definitive nature of the upward adjustment abroad, the Director of the Italian Revenue Agency shall issue a ruling on the downward adjustment in Italy corresponding to the upwards adjustment abroad.

Finally, the new regulation includes provisions on the relation between the aforementioned procedure for downward adjustment in Italy and MAP. In this regard, the regulation stipulates that the submission of a request as above functions for the activation of MAP as per the applicable legal instrument. If downwards adjustment is not granted by the Italian tax authorities, the taxpayer can still independently activate MAP under a DTC or the EU Arbitration Convention. Equally, taxpayers can proceed directly with MAP, without first submitting a request under the procedure herein.

Antonella Della Rovere

Antonella Della Rovere
Partner 

a.dellarovere
@crowevalente.it

 

Federico Vincenti

Federico Vincenti
Tax manager

f.vincenti
@crowevalente.it

Crowe Valente/ Valente Associati GEB Partners www.crowevalente.it



more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Burford Capital said it hopes that the US Congress will not ‘set back’ business growth and innovation by introducing a tax on litigation funding profits
The new framework simplifies the process of relocating eligible employees to Luxembourg and offers a ‘clear and streamlined benefit’, says Alexandra Clouté of Ashurst
The Portuguese firm’s managing partner tells ITR about his love of Sporting Lisbon, the stress of his '24-hour role', and why tax is never boring
The reduction would still ‘leave room’ for pillar two and further reductions would be possible, one expert tells ITR
Funding from private equity house EQT will propel WTS Germany to compete with the ‘big four’, the firm’s leaders told ITR in an extensive interview
New Zealand is bucking the trend of its international counterparts with its investment-friendly visa approach. Here’s what high-net-worth investors need to know
However, nearly 10% of reports only disclosed activities in tax havens, according to the Fair Tax Foundation; in other news, Plante Moran sealed a US east coast merger
While pillar one is still alive, it will apply to a smaller group of companies, Brian Foley also told ITR
Tax teams that centralise and automate their pillar two data will have a much easier time during reporting season, says Hank Moonen, CEO of TaxModel
While GCCs drive efficiency for multinationals, they also present a host of TP risks that should be considered carefully
Gift this article