New guidance on Greek TP documentation for mergers by absorption

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

New guidance on Greek TP documentation for mergers by absorption

Greece

The General Secretariat of Public Revenues in Greece issued a new Ministerial Circular on June 6, which refers to the application of transfer pricing documentation rules in cases of mergers by absorption, realised according to the provisions of Law 2166/1993 concerning business restructurings.

Liable company

More specifically, the new ministerial circular clarifies that, in a case of a merger of two companies by absorption, pursuant to the favourable provisions of L. 2166/1993 on business restructurings, the intragroup transactions that take place between the absorbed company and its associated enterprises after the compilation date of  the transformation balance sheet and until the completion date of  the restructuring (i.e. the date that the respective decision is registered in the General Electronic Commercial Registry), should be properly documented in terms of compliance with the arm’s-length principle by the absorbed company, which is, in principle, subject to the TP documentation requirements enacted by article 21 of L. 4174/2013 or the Greek Code of Tax Procedures(GCTP).

In other words, it is the absorbed company which is liable to proceed to the compilation of a respective TP file. This should include the documentation of the abovementioned intragroup transactions that have taken place following the issuance of the transformation balance sheet and up until the completion of the relevant merger, as well as the electronic submission of a respective summary information table to the General Secretariat of Informational Systems at the Ministry of Finance. It goes without saying that such a requirement exists in case the specific conditions of art. 21 of the GCTP are fulfilled, namely when the intercompany transactions in total exceed the annual thresholds of €100,000 ($112,500), for companies with turnover less than €5,000,000, and €200,000,for companies with turnover exceeding €5,000,000.

This is also in line with the interpretative Ministerial Circular POL. 1080/5.4.1994. According to this, the merged company continues to exist, to conduct transactions and to issue the relevant tax records following the compilation of the transformation balance sheet and until the completion of the merger and the incorporation of the new company (post-merger).  However, all these transactions are regarded as having been conducted by the new company and, therefore, all these actions will be transferred in the new company’s accounting books with an aggregate accounting entry, following its establishment. 

Tested transactions

Furthermore, it is also clarified that such a documentation requirement covers all intragroup transactions conducted between the absorbed company and its associated enterprises. The only exclusions are the transactions that have taken place between the absorbed company and the absorbing company during the specific time period mentioned above, given that for such transactions a reversal entry in the accounting books of the absorbing company can be effected , following the merger by absorption, which renders any documentation of the said transactions unnecessary.

Further to the above, the recently issued ministerial circular stipulates that, in a case of intragroup transactions that have been conducted by the absorbed company until the date of issuance of the transformation balance sheet, the TP documentation file is prepared and the respective summary information table is electronically submitted within four  months after the date of compilation of the transportation balance sheet, which also constitutes the respective fiscal year end, as prescribed by the Ministerial Circular POL. 1231/21.10.2015, since no liquidation process applies, provided that the conditions of art. 21 of the GCTP, as referred to above, are cumulatively met.       

Eftichia Piligou

Eftichia Piligou , Tax principal epiligou@deloitte.gr

 

Vasiliki Athanasaki

Vasiliki Athanasaki, Tax supervisor vathanasaki@deloitte.gr

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Authors from Khaitan & Co dissect a ‘welcome’ ruling, which found that the mere existence of a tax benefit would not, by itself, warrant a principal purpose test
Over two-thirds of survey respondents back the continuation of the UK’s digital services tax, research commissioned by the Fair Tax Foundation also found
Given the US/G7 pillar two deal, the OECD is in danger of being replaced by the UN as the leading global tax reform forum
Cinven’s latest investment follows its acquisition of a stake in Grant Thornton UK in December; in other news, a barrister listed by HMRC as a tax avoidance promoter has alleged harassment
CIT base narrowing measures remain more prevalent than increased CIT rates, the report also highlighted
ITR's parent company, LBG, will acquire The Lawyer, a leading news, intelligence and data-driven insight provider for the legal industry, from Centaur Media
KPMG UK’s Graeme Webster and KPMG Meijburg & Co’s Eduard Sporken outline the 20-year evolution of MAPAs, with DEMPE analyses becoming more prevalent and MAPA requirements growing stricter
Rishi Joshi, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, warns of potential judicial overreach as assets are recharacterised to bypass a legislative exclusion
Only 2% of in-house survey respondents said they were ‘heavy’ users of AI for TP, Aibidia’s report also found
There was a ‘deeply embedded culture within PwC that routinely disregarded formal confidentiality obligations,’ the chairman of Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board said
Gift this article