Canada’s 2019 federal budget introduces transfer pricing measures

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada’s 2019 federal budget introduces transfer pricing measures

Ottawa - Large

Deloitte’s Phil Fortier and Tony Anderson summarise the transfer pricing (TP) measures in Canada’s 2019 federal budget.

Canada’s 2019 federal budget, released March 19, proposes two new measures concerning the relationship between the transfer pricing (TP) rules in the Income Tax Act (ITA) and other provisions of the ITA. The budget also provides commentary on the ongoing BEPS project.

A summary of the TP-related measures contained in the budget is provided below.

Transfer pricing measures

The two budget measures related to TP include the order of application of the TP rules and the definition of transaction for an extended reassessment period.

Order of application of the transfer pricing rules

Canada’s government proposes amending the ITA to clarify that the TP rules in Part XVI.1 (s. 247) should have priority of application over other provisions in the ITA. The budget notes that this change may have various implications and provides an example on the calculation of TP penalties imposed under Part XVI.1 of the ITA. 

The budget notes that the current exceptions to the application of TP rules that pertain to Canadian resident corporations that have amounts owing from controlled foreign affiliates, or guarantees of amounts owed by controlled foreign affiliates, will continue to apply.

The order of application measure will apply to taxation periods that begin on or after March 19 2019.

Definition of transaction for extended reassessment period

Canada’s government has also proposed amending the ITA to ensure that the term “transaction” has the same meaning in both the TP rules and the applicable reassessment rules.

As background, an extended three-year reassessment period applies to reassessments made as a consequence of a transaction involving a taxpayer and a non-resident with whom the taxpayer does not deal at arm’s-length.

The budget notes that this reassessment extension is intended to apply in the TP context, but that the expanded definition of “transaction” used in the TP rules does not apply for purposes of the extended reassessment period. As such, the change in definition of transaction for reassessment purposes is intended to better align the TP rules and the extended three-year reassessment period.

The change to the definition of “transaction” for purposes of the extended reassessment period will apply to taxation periods of taxpayers for which the normal reassessment period ends on or after March 19 2019.

Update on the BEPS project

The budget reiterates that the Canadian government continues to cooperate and actively participate in the OECD project known as the BEPS initiative.

Multilateral instrument

The budget notes that the Canadian government is taking the necessary steps to enact the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (MLI) into Canadian law, and to ratify the MLI as needed to bring the tool into force.

Country-by-country reporting

In addition, the budget notes that Canada is currently participating in an OECD review of the information being collected in the country-by-country reports to ensure that they provide tax administrations with information that facilitates accurate assessment for TP and other BEPS risks. This review is scheduled to be completed in 2020

Phil Fortier - Portrait

Phil Fortier

 

anderson.jpg

Tony Anderson





This article was written by Phil Fortier and Tony Anderson of Deloitte LLP in Canada. 

Phil Fortier, Partner
Deloitte LLP
Email: philfortier@deloitte.ca

Tony Anderson, Partner
Deloitte LLP
Email: toanderson@deloitte.ca



© 2019. For information, contact Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.

This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, its member firms or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte network”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the Deloitte network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this communication.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

As recent surveys suggest a disconnect between AI adoption and employee engagement, the big four risk digging themselves into a strategic hole
Almost three-quarters of surveyed tax professionals are concerned about inaccurate AI outputs; in other news, Dentons hired a partner from CMS to lead its Belgian tax team
Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Gift this article