Spain: New tax measures affecting holdings in subsidiaries

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: New tax measures affecting holdings in subsidiaries

fernandez.jpg

Pedro Fernandez

The Spanish Parliament has enacted new tax measures which will have a significant impact on the way Spanish companies have traditionally structured their investments via holdings in domestic or foreign subsidiaries. For many years Spain has been one of the few OECD jurisdictions that allows companies to take a tax deduction for the impairment of their shareholdings in subsidiaries. Although historically the deduction required the impairment of the holding to be recorded in the investor's books, this requirement was eliminated in 2008 for holdings in companies qualifying as group entities, jointly controlled entities or affiliates. In these cases the deduction, in the form of a book-to-tax adjustment, was tied to the mere reduction of the amount of equity in the subsidiary, as adjusted by (1) those expenses which were not regarded as tax deductible under the Spanish CIT Law, and (2) in the case of holdings in foreign companies, the result of re-computing the reduction in equity in accordance with Spanish GAAP.

The complexity of the two adjustments, particularly in groups with operations in multiple jurisdictions and sophisticated corporate structures, has converted this deduction into one of the most contentious areas between the Tax Administration and taxpayers. In addition, the deduction has enabled Spanish businesses to significantly reduce their corporate income tax payments. Possibly with a view to curbing these two effects, the government has proposed and the parliament has approved the elimination of this deduction. Logically, in the interest of neutrality, it has also established that losses incurred by foreign permanent establishments (PEs) will not be deductible either.

The removal of this deduction is going to affect the valuation of projects where there are multiple investors, none of whom holds a stake of more than 75% in the venture. This is the minimum threshold generally required to qualify for tax group consolidation and, where it is possible, it is certainly the most straightforward way to enjoy the tax shelter that net operating losses naturally provide.

Where that threshold is not present, which is usually the case in joint ventures, the challenge is how to optimise the use of tax losses. In other jurisdictions, this is traditionally achieved through the use of tax transparent vehicles, or entities that can be disregarded for tax purposes, in which the losses flow proportionally to the investors.

We do not currently enjoy such look-through entities in Spain, other than a form of unlimited liability partnership known as a sociedad civil which, on the other hand, is not legally designed to carry on a trade (indeed, there is some controversy about whether the sociedad civil can maintain its tax look-through status when it engages in a trade) or some special forms of agreements suitable for certain limited activities for the benefit of their members or for businesses that come together to carry out a certain project, typically of a temporary nature, such as construction work.

Where the project is located outside Spain, the challenge is even bigger – almost insurmountable – where the trade would create a PE abroad since the losses attributable to the PE will not be deductible under the new regulations. This is, undoubtedly, a matter to be carefully reviewed.

Pedro Fernandez (pedro.fernandez@garrigues.com)

Garrigues Taxand

Tel: +34 91 514 52 00

Website: www.garrigues.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Countries that care about the fair taxation of tech multinationals and equitable global distribution of wealth should back the UN’s tax framework, writes economist Abdelmalek Riad
The cuts disproportionately affected staff in certain positions, the report also found; in other news, MHA announced the €24m acquisition of Baker Tilly South East Europe
Gift this article