Brazil: Government raises ceiling for presumed profit method

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Government raises ceiling for presumed profit method

weiss.jpg

jeffrey.jpg

Nélio B Weiss


Philippe Jeffrey

On May 17 2013, the Brazilian government published Federal Law No. 12.814 which raised the ceiling for the presumed profit method (lucro presumido) of computing corporate income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution on net income (CSLL) from BRL 48 million ($22.5 million) to BRL 78 million. Accordingly, as from January 1 2014, qualifying legal entities with a gross annual revenue not exceeding BRL 78 million, or proportionally to the number of months the company is operational in a given calendar year (if less than 12 months), will be able to opt for computing income taxes in this manner.

Under the presumed profit method, taxable income is calculated on a quarterly basis and corresponds to a deemed profit margin applied over gross revenue, adjusted as determined by tax law.

Generally speaking, for IRPJ purposes, the statutory profit margin is defined as 8% of gross revenue for most commercial and manufacturing activities, over which the regular 25% IRPJ rate is applied (15% plus a surcharge of 10% on annual taxable income in excess of BRL 240,000).

For CSLL purposes, the presumed profit margin is defined as 12% for the same activities, over which the 9% rate is levied. For most services, the profit margin is set at 32% for both IRPJ and CSLL, although exceptions do apply.

The benefit of this method lies in its simplicity, as it disregards expenses and costs and also requires no transfer pricing adjustments for import transactions with related parties. It is usually advantageous for qualifying companies whose actual profit margins are higher than the statutory presumed profit margins.

Some companies, such as financial institutions, are prevented from using the presumed profit method and must compute taxable income under the actual profit method (lucro real).

In contrast, under the actual profit method, computed on either an annual (calendar year) or quarterly basis, taxable income is calculated over book results, adjusted by certain additions and exclusions, as determined by Brazilian legislation. Tax losses generated can be carried forward indefinitely, however, taxpayers may only compensate up to 30% of the taxable profit generated in a given year with accumulated losses.

The choice between the two tax regimes is largely left to the taxpayer, provided that the necessary legal requirements are met, and will depend on what is more advantageous for the company, considering all relevant aspects.

Changes to IOF rate over inflow of funds for certain investments

By means of Federal Decree No. 8.023/2013, published on June 5, the Brazilian government has reduced the rate of IOF (tax on financial transactions) from 6% to zero in cases of foreign exchange transactions for the inflow of funds into Brazil for investment in the financial and capital markets, which includes fixed-income investments as well as the purchase of government bonds.

Further, the reduction also applies to the inflow of funds for the purposes of constituting margins, as required by stock, commodities and futures exchanges.

In relation to variable income investments, the applicable IOF rate for inflow of funds into Brazil had already been reduced to zero as from December 1 2011.

These new provisions are effective immediately.

Nélio B Weiss (nelio.weiss@br.pwc.com) and Philippe Jeffrey (philippe.jeffrey@br.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674 2271

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Germany has forgotten to think about digital reporting requirements, a WTS partner claimed at ITR’s Indirect Tax Forum 2025
E-invoicing is currently characterised by dynamism, with fragmentation acting as a key catalyst for increasing interoperability, says Aida Cavalera of the International Observatory on eInvoicing
Pillar two and the US tax system ‘could work in harmony’, Scott Levine tells ITR in an exclusive interview to mark his arrival at Baker McKenzie
Peter White, who has a tax debt of A$2 million, has been banned for five years from seeking registration with Australia’s Tax Practitioners Board (TPB)
Wopke Hoekstra’s comments followed US measures aimed against ‘unfair foreign taxes’; in other news, Grant Thornton and Holland & Knight made key tax partner hires
An Administrative Review Tribunal ruling last month in Australia v Alcoa represents a 'concerning trend' for the tax authority, one expert tells ITR
A recent decision underlines that Indian courts are more willing to look beyond just legal compliance and examine whether foreign investment structures have real business substance
Following his Liberal Party’s election victory, one source expects Mark Carney to follow the international consensus on pillar two, as experts assess the new administration
A German economics professor was reportedly ‘irritated’ by how the Finnish ministry of finance used his data
Gift this article