Laos: Stock market tax incentives

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Laos: Stock market tax incentives

harrison.jpg

Daniel Harrison

In what is undoubtedly an effort to promote the growth of Laos' first and only capital market, the regulators have introduced key tax incentives related to investment associated with the Lao Securities Exchange (LSX). While there are only two companies listed on the stock exchange, there is an expectation that a handful of other entities will list in the near future. The two companies listed are EDL-Generation Public Company (EDL-Gen), a subsidiary of the state-owned energy company, Electricite du Laos (EDL), and Banque Pour Le Commerce Exterieur Lao Public (BCEL), the largest bank in Laos.

As touched on in a previous article (December/January 2013), from January 1 2013 – transitional measures aside – Laos instated a general profit tax rate of 24% for domestic and foreign entities alike; a reduction from 28% previously, and 35% before that.

Additionally, in an effort to fast-track listings on the recently established LSX, companies floating on the exchange will enjoy a profit tax rate reduction of five percentage points (a tax rate of 19%) for a period of four years from the date of registration on the LSX, under article 29 of the Amended Tax Law (No. 05/NA, dated December 20 2011).

Further to the profit tax rate reduction of companies listing on the exchange, under article 46 of the Amended Tax Law, dividend distributions and profit derived from share sales of companies listed on the LSX are non-taxable income. Ordinarily, dividend distributions and profit on the sale of shares are both subject to income tax at the rate of 10%, for both domestic and foreign investors – with the tax collected via withholding.

These incentives sound great on paper, but what do they mean in real financial terms for investors? Below are two very simple comparisons between an investment in a listed and non-listed company, ceteris paribus.

Comparison A

Assuming an initial investment of $1,000, with a modest return on equity (ROE) of 15%, a dividend payout ratio of 100% and modest capital growth of 10%, the financial benefits of the tax incentives can be illustrated as shown in Table 1.

Table 1


Non-listed

Listed

Investment

$

1,000

$

1,000


Net (operating) profit before tax

$

150

$

150

Profit tax rate


24%


19%

Net (operating) profit after tax

$

114

$

122


Dividend paid

$

114

$

122

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Net dividend after tax

$

103

$

122


Proceeds from sale of investment

$

1,100

$

1 ,100

Less: Initial investment

$

-1,000

$

-1,000

Profit on sale of investment

$

100

$

100

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Profit on sale of investment after tax

$

90

$

100


Total net income from investment





Dividend

$

103

$

122

Capital growth

$

90

$

100


$

193

$

222


Total after-tax return on initial invesment


19.26%


22.15%


Additional after-tax return on initial investment




2.89%

Comparison B

For the same initial investment of $1,000, if the ROE is increased to 20%, the dividend payout ratio remains at 100% and capital growth is increased to 15%, the financial benefits of the tax incentives are compounded. See Table 2.

Table 2


Non-listed

Listed

Investment

$

1,000

$

1,000


Net (operating) profit before tax

$

200

$

200

Profit tax rate


24%


19%

Net (operating) profit after tax

$

152

$

162


Dividend paid

$

152

$

162

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Net dividend after tax

$

137

$

162


Proceeds from sale of investment

$

1,150

$

1,150

Less: Initial investment

$

-1,000

$

-1,000

Profit on sale of investment

$

150

$

150

Income tax rate


10%


0%

Profit on sale of investment after tax

$

135

$

150


Total net income from investment





Dividend

$

137

$

162

Capital growth

$

135

$

150


$

272

$

312


Total after-tax return on initial invesment


27.18%


31.20%


Additional after-tax return on initial investment




4.02%

While equities trading is still a relatively new concept in Laos, these favourable tax breaks coupled with the efforts of the LSX and its registered brokers to educate potential investors, along with companies' growing demand for greater access to capital raising avenues, should ensure the rapid transformation of equities investment in Laos.

Daniel Harrison (daniel.harrison@vdb-loi.com)

VDB Loi

Tel: +85 62 145 4679

Website: www.vdb-loi.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article