Tizhong Liao

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Tizhong Liao

Deputy director, Chinese State Administration of Taxation International Department

Tizhong Liao

Tizhong Liao has been deputy director general of China’s State Administration of Taxation’s International Taxation Department since 2006. He is also the first vice-chair of the UN’s Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters, working alongside fellow Top 50 entry, Armando Lara Yaffar.

Liao represents a strong voice in the UN Tax Committee meetings and has demonstrated an approachable attitude to the international tax community from an SAT perspective.

International Tax Review: In terms of transfer pricing, to what extent are China’s specific tax issues not being answered by the OECD?

Tizhong Liao: China started looking into transfer pricing issues in the late 1980s. While the early focus of transfer pricing investigations was mostly on tangible goods transactions, it has since been expanded into all sorts of other transactions, particularly those involving intangibles and services. As a developing country, China faces a number of difficult challenges, many of which are not answered by the OECD, such as a lack of appropriate comparables, quantification and allocation of location specific advantages (LSAs), and identification and valuation of marketing intangibles.

ITR: What are the major challenges for China’s international tax administration?

TL: The challenges are threefold. First, legislation needs to be strengthened. The Individual Income Tax Law and its DIRs contain few substantial provisions about international taxation. The Tax Collection and Administration Law and its DIRs contain limited provisions supporting international tax administration. Both should be updated as soon as possible so as to back up daily work.

Second, international taxation should be reorganised in terms of administration. For the time being there is no separate division shouldering tax administration of residents’ offshore income. Functions regarding tax administration of residents’ offshore income are split in different departments. For example, foreign tax credit goes to the Income Tax Department, controlled foreign company goes to the International Tax Department and compliance risk analysis of large taxpayers goes to the Large Business Department.

Thirdly, international taxation is very much understaffed. In the International Tax Department, there are four people undertaking tax treaty negotiations, interpretations and applications; three people shouldering non-resident taxation; seven people doing transfer pricing audit, APA, TP-related MAP, CFC, thin-cap and GAAR; three people responsible for tax administration of residents’ offshore income and three staff doing exchange of information. It is impossible to fulfil all the obligations properly with such understaffing.

For a quality administration of the international aspect of income taxes for China, the second largest economy, in an open world, the primary thing to do is let the government realise the importance of international taxation, then legislation can be updated, organisation can be improved, resources can be properly deployed and, in the end, a better tomorrow can be expected.

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Carl Levin

View the complete list

Next »

Alan McLean

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The controversial deal will allow US-parented groups to be carved out from key aspects of pillar two
Awards
ITR invites tax firms, in-house teams, and tax professionals to make submissions for the 2027 World Tax rankings and the 2026 ITR Tax Awards globally
Pillar two was ‘weakened’ when it altered from a multinational convention agreement to simply national domestic law, Federico Bertocchi also argued
Imposing the tax on virtual assets is a measure that appears to have no legal, economic or statistical basis, one expert told ITR
The EU has seemingly capitulated to the US’s ‘side-by-side’ demands. This may be a win for the US, but the uncertainty has only just begun for pillar two
The £7.4m buyout marks MHA’s latest acquisition since listing on the London Stock Exchange earlier this year
ITR’s most prolific stories of the year charted public pillar two spats, the continued fallout from the PwC Australia tax leaks scandal, and a headline tax fraud trial
The climbdowns pave the way for a side-by-side deal to be concluded this week, as per the US Treasury secretary’s expectation; in other news, Taft added a 10-partner tax team
A vote to be held in 2026 could create Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, a $3.6bn giant with 3,100 lawyers across the Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific
Foreign companies operating in Libya face source-based taxation even without a local presence. Multinationals must understand compliance obligations, withholding risks, and treaty relief to avoid costly surprises
Gift this article