Switzerland: New Swiss Accounting Law: Overview of the key accounting and taxation changes

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: New Swiss Accounting Law: Overview of the key accounting and taxation changes

kistler.jpg

mercuri.jpg

Jacques Kistler


Ferdinando Mercuri

A new law which entered into force in Switzerland on January 1 2013 introduces new accounting and reporting requirements for all companies including associations and foundations registered in the commercial register as well as all individual undertakings and partnerships with an annual turnover over CHF500,000 ($537,000). The new law is intended to make the provisions of the Swiss Code of Obligations and of existing company law more flexible. Companies will have two accounting years from January 1 2013 to adapt their bookkeeping and financial reporting and three years to adapt consolidated financial statements.

Under the new law it is possible to present financial statements in one of the national languages, German, French or Italian, as well as in English. It is now also possible to present the accounts in a currency other than Swiss francs. Beforehand, it was always necessary to convert accounts that were kept in a functional currency into Swiss francs for year-end statutory accounting purposes. Consolidated statements have to be filed if a company exceeds two of the following criteria: CHF 40 million revenue, 250 full-time employees or CHF20 million net balance sheet, on an average annualised basis.

In terms of specific disclosures and recognition requirements for the accounts key changes include:

  • Recognition of assets if a cash inflow is probable and value can be reliably estimated;

  • Modifications to the presentation of equity;

  • New methods for valuations and the introduction of the principle of impairment; and

  • New categories for expenses and revenues.

The new criterion for including entities in consolidated statements required for large companies is "legal control" versus common management, which was the criterion for a consolidation in the past. Other additional requirements for large companies include having to prepare financial statements in accordance with recognised standards for publicly listed companies, preparing a cash flow statement and directors report with additional disclosure requirements.

It was the intention of the legislator to ensure a tax neutrality of the new rules. However, some new rules may impact companies and there are also interpretation questions that will need to be taken into consideration to assess the tax impact of the new rules. We recommend performing a readiness review to identify and incorporate the changes necessary to comply with these new legal requirements on a timely basis.

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 8164
Ferdinando Mercuri (fmercuri@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 9242
Emanuelle Brulhart (ebrulhart@deloitte.ch)

Tel +41 58 279 8047

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article