Marlies de Ruiter

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Marlies de Ruiter

Head of the OECD's Tax Treaty, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions division

Marlies de Ruiter

Marlies de Ruiter has been nominated this year for her work connected to the OECD’s Revised Proposals on Article 5 (permanent establishment) of the OECD Model Tax Convention, as head of the Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and Financial Transactions Division.

The interpretation of PE is evolving as business adapts to a more global environment. Technological advancements, more tax treaties and the realities of business transactions mean the definition of PE is changing.

The OECD does not think the guidelines cater for the way companies and government now define PE.

Based on the current draft, however, some concerns are still being raised.

Queries have been raised over the mention in the draft of “space at the disposal of”, because the notion of “having the power to use” a location is difficult to apply, if, as suggested during the OECD consultation meeting, it means something less than a legal right to use a location.

“While the first example given by the OECD, at proposed paragraph 4.2 (exclusive legal right to use or legal possession), is quite straightforward, the second one, which deals with an enterprise being “allowed to use” a location where it performs its business activities on a continuous basis during an extended period of time, is not nearly as limpid,” says Francois Vincent of KPMG in France.

“More specifically, it becomes difficult to delineate how being allowed to use space is equal to having the power to use that space; unless “being allowed” means being conferred the power to use that space, under something like a formal authorisation - which may come pretty close to a legal right to use - rather than passive acceptance of the use of space; which was part of the original concern expressed by BIAC that led to the recommendation to replace existing paragraph 4.2,” Vincent adds.

In June 2013, the OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs released for public comment a discussion draft on the tax treatment of various payments that may be made following the termination of an employment, as part of the changes to permanent establishment. These comments have now been posted online and are being considered by de Ruiter and her team.

The Global Tax 50 2013

« Previous

Tim Cook and Eric Schmidt

View the complete list

Next »

Tara Ferris

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
The global minimum tax deal is not viable without US participation, Friedrich Merz has argued
Section 899 of the ‘one big beautiful’ bill would have spelled disaster for many international investors into the US, but following its shelving, attention turns to the fate of the OECD’s pillars
Gift this article