France: Appeal Court ruling on the deduction in France of foreign final losses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Appeal Court ruling on the deduction in France of foreign final losses

taquet.jpg

raingeard.jpg

Jacques Taquet


Emmanuel Raingeard

The administrative appeal court of Versailles rendered a decision on February 26 2013 regarding final losses of foreign subsidiaries of a French company. The Court held that French legislation, which does not allow a French parent to deduct tax losses of EU subsidiaries which the latter cannot carry forward because of local legislation which limit the period for the carryover of tax losses, is actually compatible with EU law. The French taxpayer had offset losses of its Italian and Polish subsidiaries. These losses could not be carried forward locally because of Italian and Polish legislation which limit the period for the carry forward of losses.

The court ruled that the restriction is justified and does not go beyond what is necessary to attain the objectives pursued. The Court seems to imply that the decision would have been different had the losses become "final" following a liquidation of the EU subsidiary.

This decision will probably be examined by the French Supreme Court. This will give an opportunity to clarify the Marks & Spencer (C-446/03) ruling that was recently confirmed in the A Oy case (C-123/11). It seems now clear that where the loss of tax losses results from the liquidation of an enterprise, they can be considered as final losses. On the other hand, the solution is far less clear where tax losses are lost as a result of local legislation which limits the period during which losses can be carried forward.

Jacques Taquet (jacques.taquet@fr.landwellglobal.com)

Tel :+33 1 56 578360

Emmanuel Raingeard (emmanuel.raingeard@fr.landwellglobal.com)

Tel: +33 1 56 574014

Landwell & Associes – member of the PwC network

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Pillar two has been clients’ ‘biggest headache’ but also a driver of growth for MHA, which believes it has the edge over its big four rivals
Public country-by-country reporting is exposing multinational tax data to investors, journalists and competitors, creating fresh risks for businesses
Pillar two compliance is creating unprecedented data demands for multinational tax departments, making closer collaboration with FP&A teams essential for accurate reporting and audit readiness
Among the arrivals is Andrew Howell, who leaves scandal-hit PwC Australia after representing PepsiCo in a high-profile TP dispute
ITR's podcast examines whether the big four have overarching cultural issues and assesses the competitive threat of technology-backed transfer pricing firms
The UK advisory firm has seen its global revenues expand by £27.2m following its listing and acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Tax-trained John Sams, previously the firm’s CFO and COO, was appointed after a rigorous process, KPMG said
From Mauritius substance rules to Kenyan SEP tax and South African anti-avoidance measures, businesses must navigate growing scrutiny of cross-border IP structures in Africa
ITR spoke to multinationals, advisers and software providers about a June 30 deadline defined by faulty portals, high compliance costs and hard lessons
After years of onerous pillar two prep, businesses will be galled in seeing tax revenues outweighed by compliance costs
Gift this article