France: Appeal Court ruling on the deduction in France of foreign final losses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement


France: Appeal Court ruling on the deduction in France of foreign final losses

taquet.jpg

raingeard.jpg

Jacques Taquet


Emmanuel Raingeard

The administrative appeal court of Versailles rendered a decision on February 26 2013 regarding final losses of foreign subsidiaries of a French company. The Court held that French legislation, which does not allow a French parent to deduct tax losses of EU subsidiaries which the latter cannot carry forward because of local legislation which limit the period for the carryover of tax losses, is actually compatible with EU law. The French taxpayer had offset losses of its Italian and Polish subsidiaries. These losses could not be carried forward locally because of Italian and Polish legislation which limit the period for the carry forward of losses.

The court ruled that the restriction is justified and does not go beyond what is necessary to attain the objectives pursued. The Court seems to imply that the decision would have been different had the losses become "final" following a liquidation of the EU subsidiary.

This decision will probably be examined by the French Supreme Court. This will give an opportunity to clarify the Marks & Spencer (C-446/03) ruling that was recently confirmed in the A Oy case (C-123/11). It seems now clear that where the loss of tax losses results from the liquidation of an enterprise, they can be considered as final losses. On the other hand, the solution is far less clear where tax losses are lost as a result of local legislation which limits the period during which losses can be carried forward.

Jacques Taquet (jacques.taquet@fr.landwellglobal.com)

Tel :+33 1 56 578360

Emmanuel Raingeard (emmanuel.raingeard@fr.landwellglobal.com)

Tel: +33 1 56 574014

Landwell & Associes – member of the PwC network

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Nexdigm's Maulik Doshi and infer360 co-founder Sunil Agarwal dig deeper into their partnership and discuss why the tax technology industry is consolidating
Advisers won’t be short of work in a world of increased valuation disputes, documentation requirements and behavioural responses from clients seeking to protect their wealth
Jaydeep Menon explains how Frazier & Deeter built a specialist practice which helps UK start-ups expand into the US and why private equity backing is accelerating its ambitions
As joint audits, data sharing and pillar two reshape tax controversy, multinational groups can no longer afford to manage disputes one jurisdiction at a time
Brazil's tax system is being reshaped by VAT , pillar two and TP reform. Fallet explains why those changes convinced him to lead a new practice
The agreement with Daribatech, alongside recent high-profile investment in talent, suggests the firm is gearing up for a significant push in the region
Several factors have led to a steady transition of TP work away from traditional advisers and towards full-service law firms, DLA Piper’s new TP leader says
Julian Balson's departure from EY's Tier 1 tax controversy practice for lower-ranked Fieldfisher represents one of the more eye-catching UK hires of the year
Former IRS commissioner Danny Werfel argues that the biggest obstacle to AI adoption in tax is not technology, but trust, and introduces a practical AI risk framework to help
Howell takes a deep dive into how he led the landmark PepsiCo dispute, discusses the ATO's enforcement priorities, and emphasises KordaMentha's market ambitions
Gift this article