Deferred taxes related to foreign interest – what you should consider under IAS 12

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Deferred taxes related to foreign interest – what you should consider under IAS 12

fotoflexer-photodeferredtaxes.jpg

Investing in subsidiaries, branches or associates, as well as having interest in a joint venture, would trigger some consequences from a deferred tax standpoint.

These consequences are:

  • The existence of undistributed profits of subsidiaries, branches, associates and joint ventures;

  • Differences in foreign exchange rates when a parent and its subsidiary are based in different countries; and

  • A reduction in the book value of an investment (the application of the accounting method of fair value under IFRS 9 may result in a reduction of the book value of an investment)

From an International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) perspective, particularly International Accounting Standard (IAS)-12 – Income Taxes -, these items may cause a difference between the book value (either individual or consolidated) of the investment and its tax base (typically the original cost of the equity).

This temporary difference is known as outside basis and is given in the tax jurisdiction of the parent company, for example, in case of having a distribution of profits from a foreign investment, a tax liability should arise for the parent entity.

Even so, IAS -12 includes some cases by which the tax liability may not be recognised by the parent entity when:

  • the parent or investor is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference; and

  • it is probable that the temporary difference will not be reversed in the near future.

In this regard, a detailed analysis is required by all consolidation levels in a group to conclude if the parent entity must recognise a tax liability for outside basis in its financial statements.

Taking this into account, different perspectives may be found between US-GAAP [Generally Accepted Accounting Principles] and IFRS when the outside basis is analysed. For instance:

From a US-GAAP perspective, the outside basis is focused on undistributed profits, and the only exception to recognising a deferred tax liability in the parent company is to demonstrate a higher income tax rate in the foreign country where the subsidiary (which distributes the profit) is located. A full tax credit for the income tax paid abroad may be applied by the parent company therefore.

From an IFRS perspective a deeper analysis must be done to conclude if the outside basis may cause a deferred tax asset or a deferred tax liability. Some items under analysis are, in the case of a deferred tax liability to demonstrate:

  • that the parent company has effective control of the dividends policy upon the subsidiaries; and

  • the dividends will not be distributed in the foreseeable future.

In the case of a deferred tax asset:

  • to demonstrate http://bit.ly/15sL2oFenough taxable income in future years.

In the case of having a deferred tax asset related to outside temporary differences, further analysis must be done to come to a conclusion regarding its recognition in the financial statements. This analysis includes basically the ability of the parent entity to generate future taxable income.

Lessons

  • The outside basis conclusion may be different from a US-GAAP perspective concerning IFRS –IAS-12.

  • This analysis should be made from bottom to top of all consolidation levels to have full documentation regarding foreign interest, including full control in the parent company upon undistributed dividends in all subsidiaries, and joint ventures.

José Abraján (jose.abrajan@mx.ey.com), Senior Manager – Tax Accounting, EY Mexico

Guadalupe García (guadalupe.garcia@mx.ey.com), Senior – Tax Accounting, EY Mexico

Gustavo Gómez (gustavo.gomez@mx.ey.com), Partner – Corporate Taxes, EY Mexico

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Matthew Sharp, leader of London’s newest tax disputes team, shares the trials and tribulations of starting from scratch
Brazil appears to be adopting protocols to align national taxation with international standards, but recent changes are not immune from criticism, experts tell ITR
The US president did not have the authority to impose the tariffs, a court ruled; in other news, Fried Frank and Crowe Ireland made key tax hires
Pillar two considerations have become a fact of life for taxpayers everywhere, not least in Switzerland, where companies nonetheless continue to be active with investment
The Dutch TP software company’s co-founder tells ITR about speeding up documentation processes, following in Steve Jobs’s footsteps, and what makes tax cool
The ruling underscores the need for companies to provide robust and defensible valuations of intangible assets, one partner tells ITR
Pillar two is certain to be a game-changer for tax advisers and their clients. Russell Gammon of Tax Systems outlines 10 reasons why
Despite a general decline in corporate tax rates around the world, jurisdictions are now more reliant on it than in 1990, a Tax Foundation economist found
Australian law firm Webb Henderson’s report said PwC had met 46 of 47 targets; in other news, the OECD has issued new transfer pricing country profiles
The arrival of a seven-strong team from Baker McKenzie will boost WTS Germany’s transfer pricing capabilities and help it become ‘a European champion’, the firm’s CEO said
Gift this article