Chile: New regulation on indirect sale of shares

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: New regulation on indirect sale of shares

benedetto.jpg

bravo.jpg

Sandra Benedetto


Tomas Bravo

Before Law No. 19.840 entered into force on December 12 2002, the Chilean Income Tax Law (CITL) did not consider gains derived from the sales of shares or rights of a foreign company (a company incorporated abroad) as Chilean source income. The mentioned law introduced new rules to the case of indirect sales of shares. Indeed, according to such provision, gains obtained by a foreign company from the sale of shares or rights from another foreign company was considered as Chilean source income and accordingly subject to income tax when the purchaser was domiciled or resident in Chile and such acquisition allows it to participate with more than 10% in the profits or ownership of a Chilean entity.

On September 27 2012, a tax reform that modified the indirect sales rule, among other changes, was enacted. According to this new rule, the concept of Chilean source income is broadened. As set forth by this new provision, capital gains obtained on such indirect sale will be taxed in Chile, wherever the purchaser is domiciled, if the foreign company whose shares, quotas or rights are being sold has an underlying assets in Chile.

In general, for this rule to apply, at least 10% of the total shares of the foreign company should be alienated and one of the following two circumstances should be met: (a) 20% of the market value of the foreign company's shares owned by the seller corresponds to Chilean underlying assets; or, (b) the market value of the Chilean underlying assets amounts to 210,000 annual taxable units ($200 million).

This new indirect sale provision is also applicable in case the foreign company being sold is domiciled in a tax haven, unless the parties involved can demonstrate before the Chilean Internal Revenue Service that Chilean residents do not own 5% or more than the equity or profits and at least 50% of the equity or profits of the foreign entity is controlled by shareholders resident in a country that is not a tax haven.

Capital gains which arise from these transactions will be subject to a 35% sole tax which will be borne by the non-Chilean resident seller. For this purpose, the new law also set forth some provisions to define how the gain should be calculated.

How this rule will be applied, and for example, how the calculations to determine the relevant percentages should be made, or how indirect/direct participations will be computed, or the relevant cost determined, or how this regime will deal will international reorganisation processes are still some uncertain matters that should be clarified soon by the Chilean Internal Revenue. It is expected that a pronouncement regarding how this rule will be implemented is issued in the short-term.

This new indirect sales regulation regime shall be necessarily taken into account in case any international transaction that involves Chilean underlying assets is carried. Based on the abovementioned, a thorough analysis should be made from a tax perspective on a case-by-case basis because of the capital gain tax that may arise.

Sandra Benedetto (sandra.benedetto@cl.pwc.com) and Tomas Bravo (tomas.bravo@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +56 2 940 0155

Fax: +56 2 940 0189

Website: www.pwc.com/cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

One year after Nuwaru joined the WTS network, leaders James Jobson and Matthew Missaghi reflect on the firm’s mission to offer mid-tier pricing but deliver top-tier results
Join ITR's Head of Research, John Harrison, for an overview of key dates, new developments, best practices, and more for next year’s research cycle
The president’s tariff regime has already caused misery for taxpayers. Losing at the Supreme Court would mean it was all for nothing
The US itself was the biggest loser of tax revenue to American multinationals’ profit shifting, the Tax Justice Network reported; in other news, firms made key tax hires
Identifying who will bear the costs and concerns around confidentiality are issues yet to be resolved, advisers say
As multinationals embed tax technology into their TP functions, a new breed of systems – built on multi-model databases – is quietly transforming intercompany pricing logic
The president described it as ‘one of the most important cases in the history of our country’; in other news, Portugal established a VAT group regime
Clients are facing increased TP audit scrutiny in Hungary. DLA Piper Hungary is therefore using AI and advanced analytics to augment its advice, the firm’s head of TP says
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett and MinterEllisonRuddWatts were among the firms that advised on the deal
AI will mean fewer entry-level roles in tax but also the emergence of new jobs, according to tax expert Isabella Barreto
Gift this article