Germany: No real estate transfer tax charge on indirect partial transfer of partnership share

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: No real estate transfer tax charge on indirect partial transfer of partnership share

welbers.jpg

Hartwig Welbers, PwC

Real estate transfer tax (RETT) of between 3.5% and 5.5% of the taxable value of property owned by a partnership is due if at least 95% of the ownership interests in the partnership change over a five-year period. The change can be direct or indirect. On this basis, the tax office raised a RETT assessment on a partnership of two partners after the ultimate holding company of a 6% partner sold 50% of the shares in its interposed direct subsidiary to another direct subsidiary and the remaining 50% to a third party following the transfer of the 94% partnership interest by the other partner to a different third party. The tax office contention was that the effective composition of the property owning partnership had changed by more than 95%, taking all changes together. The Supreme Tax Court in its judgment II R 17/10 of April 24 2013 published on June 19 2013 has now rejected the tax office's contention. Rather, only 94% of the partnership interest had changed hands (the first transaction) and the 6% holding remained unaffected. Direct changes of ownership were a matter of legal form, while indirect changes could only be seen as a matter of business substance. In that respect only a sale of all the shares in an interposed corporation to a new ultimate shareholder enabled him to dispose over the partnership share without reference to the other investor. The 50% sale at issue did not and was not therefore the equivalent of a transfer of a 3% share in the partnership.

Whether this judgment applies to indirect changes in shareholdings in a property-owning corporation is not entirely clear, although such a conclusion would seem logical.

The tax authorities are rumoured to be considering a decree instructing tax offices not to follow this court decision as a precedent in other cases.

Hartwig Welbers (hartwig.welbers@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 711 25034 3165

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

For many taxpayers, the prospect of long-term certainty that a bilateral APA offers can override concerns about time, cost and confidentiality
Levine, who served under the Joe Biden administration, led the US’s negotiations on the OECD’s two-pillar solution
The deal to acquire ITR's parent company is expected to complete by the end of May 2025
JBS, the biggest meat company in the world, allegedly used Luxembourgian ‘mailbox companies’ to avoid taxes between 2019 and 2022
Despite the conviction of Jessa Dabalos, the Tax Practitioners’ Board’s investigative work continues with five outstanding PwC scandal probes
Heads of tax need to push their teams forward as strategic business advisers to add value across their organisations, says Sandy Markwick
Scott Bessent reportedly felt undermined by Musk naming Gary Shapley as acting IRS commissioner; in other news, Baker Tilly will combine with a top 15 US firm
The promise of nine years’ tax certainty and a ‘rational and pragmatic’ government process makes APAs a no-brainer, Indian tax advisers tell ITR
Despite garnering significant revenues from multinationals, Italy’s digital services tax presents pressing double taxation issues, say Stefano Simontacchi and Francesco Saverio Scandone of BonelliErede
ITR’s research shows that in-house tax counsel in Asia also feel underserved by their advisers’ international networks
Gift this article