Mexico: New criteria to withhold VAT to foreign residents

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: New criteria to withhold VAT to foreign residents

cuellar.jpg

nava.jpg

David Cuellar


Marco Nava

On May 31 2013 the Mexican tax authorities issued non-binding criteria on the application of the value added tax (VAT) law regarding VAT withholding to foreign residents, when certain transactions are carried out with Mexican taxpayers. According to the Mexican VAT Law, Mexican taxpayers are obliged to withhold and remit 16% VAT on the acquisition or leasing of tangible goods that are sold or granted by a foreign resident without a permanent establishment (PE) in Mexico. With this mechanism, Mexican taxpayers withhold the corresponding VAT and, if certain conditions are met, they can credit such VAT.

Additionally, the Mexican VAT law establishes that a foreign resident would be deemed as resident in Mexican territory for VAT purposes when it has one or more establishments (which may be intrepreted as not necessarily permanent, but just an establishment) for all the activities carried out therein. Consequently, there was an interpretation which suggested that some foreigners may be tax residents in Mexico for VAT purposes but not for income tax purposes and therefore the 16% withholding VAT resulted not applicable, without taking into consideration whether they have a PE in Mexico, or not.

In this regard, the Mexican tax authorities issued new criteria establishing that when a foreign resident without a PE in Mexico carries out activities regarding the acquisition or leasing of tangible goods in Mexico, the PE definition in the income tax law or in the tax treaties concluded by Mexico should be applicable; and it should be deemed as a non-binding criteria when a foreign resident with no PE in Mexico carries out these types of activities and the Mexican taxpayer does not withhold VAT, considering that the foreign resident is resident in Mexico for VAT purposes.

If an annual statutory tax report needs to be filed to the Mexican tax authorities by the auditor of a Mexican taxpayer, the auditor should disclose whether non-binding criteria were applied by the taxpayer, so these transactions should be reviewed in detail during the audit process.

It is recommended that foreign residents carefully structure their operations when leasing or selling tangible goods to Mexican residents on a case-by-case basis, and determine the corresponding tax consequences that may arise in Mexico both for income tax and VAT purposes.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Marco Nava (marco.a.nava@us.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
The tax agency has increased compliance yield from wealthy individuals but cannot identify how much tax is paid by UK billionaires, the committee also claimed
Saffery cautioned that documentation requirements in new government proposals must be limited if medium-sized companies are not exempted from TP
Gift this article