Argentina changes information reporting rules for trusts

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina changes information reporting rules for trusts

argentina-flag2.jpg

New information reporting rules for financial and non-financial trusts took effect in Argentina on July 1.

Resolución General 3312/2012 issued by Administración Federal de Ingresos Públicos (AFIP), Argentina's tax administration, amends the information reporting regime for foreign and domestic financial and non-financial trusts. Compliance with the requirements is through annual electronic filing with the AFIP.

The general resolution also establishes rules for registering the operations of certain trustees.


"Under the previous regime, the information requirements applied only with respect to domestic trusts whereas the new regime also covers foreign trusts or similar structures that have an Argentine connection, that is the settlor, trustee or beneficiary is located in Argentina," said Nicolas Garfunkel, a manager in international corporate tax for KPMG.

fotoflexer-photoafipsmall.jpg

The Resolution also sets up a regime for trust-related transactions, meaning that the creation of the trust, the incorporation of trustees and/or beneficiaries, amendments to the trust agreement and distributions are examples of transactions that must be reported within 10 days of being carried out.

If the trust has been set up in Argentina, the trustee will be responsible for reporting the transaction. In the case of foreign trusts the settlor and beneficiaries are responsible.

"In recent times the tax authorities have increased the general reporting requirements for all taxpayers in an effort to increase revenues," said Garfunkel. "I would not say that this is bad for the taxpayers, but of course foreign trusts are mainly used as a succession planning instrument and I don’t think that they will be happy to share all the details with the authorities."

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
The profession is fundamentally restructuring itself around what tax and accounting work should be, a Thomson Reuters leader told ITR
Gift this article