Channel Islands lose LVCR High Court battle

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Channel Islands lose LVCR High Court battle

channel-islands.jpg

The Channel Islands have today lost their battle to overturn the UK government’s decision to block low value consignment relief (LVCR).

This week the UK High Court heard a judicial review of the case, which related to the islands benefitting from this VAT exemption, and ruled that the proposed changes to LVCR are compliant with EU VAT law

The UK chancellor is expected to formally announce the end of LVCR in next week’s budget.

This will mean that from April 1, it is anticipated that VAT of will be applied to all commercial consignments from the Channel Islands, regardless of value.

Mr Justice Mitting told Jersey and Guernsey they could appeal the decision to a higher court.

“I am extremely disappointed at this outcome and we will now be considering whether to lodge an appeal,” said Alan Maclean, Jersey’s Economic Development Minister. “The changes, which are targeted against the Channel Islands alone, create an uneven playing field. We know that some businesses will find it difficult to compete under these circumstances and as such, jobs are likely to be lost

LVCR was established under EU law in the 1980s to exempt low value goods purchased and imported outside the EU from VAT, to cut the administrative costs associated with collecting small amounts of the tax.

However, companies such as Amazon and HMV set up offshore mail-order operations in Jersey and Guernsey – which are not part of the EU – to exploit the VAT relief loophole.

Click here to find out how Channel Island companies will continue to take advantage of the exemption.

FURTHER READING:

Why HMV and Channel Islands’ resistance to scrapping tax relief is futile

UK TREASURY: Why the VAT relief must end

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Von Wobeser y Sierra’s head of tax shares best practices for resolving tax controversy and touts his firm’s founding partner as an exemplar of legal practice
ITR concludes its analysis of World Tax’s rankings for 2026 by highlighting the firms that stood out most on a global scale
Experts from law firm Kennedys outline the key tax disputes trends set to define 2026, ranging from increased enforcement to continued tariff drama and AI usage
They also warned against an ‘unnecessary duplication of efforts’ in UN tax convention negotiations; in other news, White & Case has hired Freshfields’ former French tax head
Awards
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL EMEA Awards by 16 February 2026
Defending loss situations in TP is not about denying the existence of losses but about showing, through proactive measures, that the losses reflect genuine commercial realities
Further empowerment of HMRC enforcement has been praised, but the pre-Budget OBR leak was described as ‘shambolic’
Michel Braun of WTS Digital reviews ITR’s inaugural AI in tax event, and concludes that AI will enhance, not replace, the tax professional
The report is solid and balanced as it correctly underscores the ambitious institutional redesign that Brazil has undertaken in adopting a dual VAT model, experts tell ITR
The Brazilian law firm partner warns against going independent too early, considers the weight of political pressure, and tells ITR what makes tax cool
Gift this article