The US Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo earlier this year caught the attention of tax professionals. George Hani and Alan Horowitz of Miller & Chevalier, Washington, DC, argue that the full impact of the case will depend on the outcome of a new case addressing whether deference is owed to a more aggressive effort by the IRS to issue regulations with retroactive effect.
Unlock this content.
The content you are trying to view is exclusive to our subscribers.
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions