Switzerland: Revised guidance on the taxation of Swiss principal companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Switzerland: Revised guidance on the taxation of Swiss principal companies

hess.jpg

stutzmann.jpg

Jackie Hess


Daniel Stutzmann

The taxation of Swiss principal companies is based on Circular Letter no. 8, which was published by the Swiss Federal Tax Administration (SFTA) on December 18 2001. Provided the requirements set out in the Circular Letter are met, the Swiss principal can for direct federal tax purposes allocate a fixed percentage of trading profits abroad (an international tax allocation), which renders those profits exempt from the Swiss tax base. The SFTA has recently provided the cantonal tax authorities with revised guidance including detailed calculation guidelines on how this Circular Letter should be applied.

The new guidelines are expected to become effective for companies with existing principal company rulings in most cantons as per tax year 2016 (although some cantons have yet to confirm from the effective date). For new principal company rulings the new guidelines have already to be complied with today. The new guidelines that have to be considered in connection with the principal company allocation for direct federal tax are the following:

  • 3% gross profit margin for commissionaires/LRDs: The trading profit that benefits from the international tax allocation is newly linked to the margin/commission generated at the level of the commissionaire/LRD. As a result, a maximum allocation of 50% of the trading profit abroad is permitted only where the margin/commission at the level of the commissionaire/LRD does not exceed 3% of the gross revenue (or, if higher, the costs of the commissionaire/LRD: the respective costs are comprised of the operational cost and taxes according to the local financial statements of all qualifying commissionaires/LRDs). If the effective remuneration of the commissionaires/LRDs exceeds the allowed remuneration (3% or higher cost) this has to be taken into account for the international tax allocation. The tax allocation will be corrected in the extent of 50% of the exceeding remuneration of the commissionaires/LRDs.

  • Exclusivity of commissionaires/LRDs: An international tax allocation may be claimed only if the distributing company makes sales exclusively for the principal or other principals of the group, that is where the distributing company is entirely dependent on the principal. A dependent relationship will be presumed where at least 90% of the distributor's profit derives from trade with goods of the principal or other principals of the group. The 90% criterion has generally to be met on a long term basis and is assessed on an entity-by-entity basis.

  • Outsourcing of principal operating functions: The outsourcing of principal operating functions to foreign group companies does generally lead to a complete denial of the principal company allocation for direct federal tax. The principal allocation may however still be granted if only individual principal functions are outsourced. In such case however the principal company allocation to abroad will be reduced by 50% of the profit generated by the foreign companies on the outsourced principal functions.

  • Effect of mutual agreement procedure (MAP)/advance pricing agreement (APA): A MAP or an APA no longer will result in an automatic denial of the international allocation to the relevant country (which previously was the case); instead, there only will be an adjustment of the allocation quota.

Groups with existing Swiss principal structures should carefully review these structures and prepare for discussions with the tax authorities regarding the implementation of the new guidelines.

Jackie Hess (jahess@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 (0)58 279 6312

Daniel Stutzmann (dastutzmann@deloitte.com )

Tel: +1 (212) 492 4083

Jacques Kistler (jkistler@deloitte.ch)

Tel: +41 58 279 8164

Deloitte

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article