Hong Kong: Tax concessions to captive insurance companies

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong: Tax concessions to captive insurance companies

lau.jpg

bowdern.jpg

Ayesha Lau


Darren Bowdern

Legislation was introduced into the Legislative Council in January 2014 to provide a profits tax concession to captive insurance companies in respect of their profits from the business of insurance of offshore risks. Such profits are to be chargeable to profits tax at half the normal rate, that is 8.25%. The Inland Revenue (Amendment) (No. 3) Bill 2013 was gazetted on December 27 2013. The Bill seeks to give effect to the proposal in the 2013-14 Budget that the profits tax on the offshore insurance business of captive insurance companies would be reduced in line with the tax concession applicable to reinsurance companies. The financial secretary considered that attracting a cluster of large-scale captive insurers in Hong Kong would promote the development of other related businesses, including reinsurance, making Hong Kong's risk management services more diversified.

The objective of the Bill is to reduce by half the profits tax on profits derived from the offshore risks insurance business of captive insurers (which are typically set up to underwrite the risks of companies within the same group to which the captive insurers belong).

Subject to the Bill being passed by the Legislative Council, the tax concession will have effect for years of assessment 2013-14 and subsequent.

Hong Kong, with its sound regulatory regime and well developed financial infrastructure, is well positioned to establish itself as a centre for captive insurance in Asia and this should in turn reinforce Hong Kong's status as a regional insurance hub.

However, while this latest development is encouraging, it needs to be viewed against Hong Kong only having two captive insurers. Whether the proposed reduction in the profits tax rate will be sufficient to attract companies to locate in Hong Kong, rather than jurisdictions such as Singapore (which has the largest captive insurance market in Asia) remains to be seen.

That said, Hong Kong with its close proximity to China should be an attractive location for Chinese companies with significant captive insurance needs to establish their headquarters.

The Inland Revenue Department announced in December 2013 that the comprehensive double taxation agreement (CDTA) between Qatar and Hong Kong, signed on May 13 2013, came into effect on December 5 2013 and will have effect in Hong Kong as from April 1 2014. At the moment, only the CDTAs with Italy and Guernsey have yet to enter into force.

Ayesha Lau (ayesha.lau@kpmg.com) and Darren Bowdern (darren.bowdern@kpmg.com)

KPMG

Tel: +852 2826 8028 & +852 2826 7166

Website: www.kpmg.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article