EU: Update on the EU FTT

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU: Update on the EU FTT

van-der-made.jpg

Bob van der Made

The German and French leaders publicly restated their commitment to lead the way on EU FTT on February 19 and also offered a self-imposed, concrete timeline for a compromise agreement among the EU11 participating member states by May. Notwithstanding that announcement, much remains to be done on the technical side and to reconcile the various interests of the EU11. The EU11 are meeting regularly and informally again in Brussels.

The next formal full EU28 Council working group meeting discussion on the FTT will be held on March 24 in Brussels and will be presided over by the Greeks. It will include a presentation by the European Central Bank (ECB) on technical EU FTT-related issues. However, it is unlikely that by then the EU11 will have reached a full-blown compromise and thus they may still be reticent in this EU28 setting.

It is understood that the Germans and French will likely be trying hard to find broad agreement first with the Italians and Spanish, and then with the other seven smaller member states participating in the enhanced cooperation procedure by May, around three main issues:

  • Which principle will apply: issuance or residence?

  • What is in scope?

  • Agree to step-by-step approach to implementation.

The French are apparently more involved again now, and both the French and the Germans are keen to demonstrate that the EU enhanced cooperation procedure (ECP) can be successful on such a politically difficult economic and financial EU policy measure, which in turn might lead to more use of ECP in other European monetary union related financial or economic initiatives.

It is now increasingly clear that a phased approach to introduction will be adopted, with a likely first step being an Italian stamp duty like the EU FTT model with a tax on equities and possibly equity derivatives.

If implementation is to happen in 2016, then this means that the participating member states will have to agree and start implementation in domestic law at the latest by the beginning of 2015. This is widely considered to be very ambitious, given where we are at this stage in the development of the EU FTT, however this highly political dossier remains hard to predict.

Bob van der Made (bob.van.der.made@nl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +31 88 792 3696

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article