Mexico: Sworn statement for the applicability of tax treaty benefits

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Sworn statement for the applicability of tax treaty benefits

cuellar.jpg

sanchez.jpg

David Cuellar


Nidia Sanchez

Derived from the approval of 2014's Mexican Tax reform package, various amendments to the Mexican tax laws have been enacted. One of them is the inclusion of faculties to the Mexican Tax Authorities with respect to the applicability of tax treaty benefits when transactions are performed between related parties. In this regard, the Mexican Tax Authorities are now entitled to request a foreign resident to certify the existence of international juridical double taxation through the issuance of a sworn statement. Such statement should be signed by the legal representative of the foreign resident intending to apply treaty benefits, and should attest that income is being subject to taxation in the country of residence of the recipient. The statement should also mention the applicable regulations and provide supporting documentation.

Note that Mexican legislation does not establish what double taxation means, but in general terms, the OECD Model Tax Convention Commentaries on articles 23-A and 23-B establishes that juridical double taxation should be understood where the same income (or capital) is taxable in the hands of the same person by more than one country.

Because of the fact that it may be difficult for certain foreign taxpayers to obtain such kind of statement derived from the applicable foreign regulations (territorial tax regimes) or from a specific kind of transaction (a tax free reorganisation), on December 30 2013, the Mexican tax authorities published in the Official Gazette the Miscellaneous Tax Regulations corresponding to the fiscal year 2014, which contain a rule addressing such situation. In this regard, the rule establishes that the Mexican tax authorities would not request the issuance of the previously mentioned sworn statement when:

  • The foreign resident is a resident in a country with a territorial tax system.

  • The foreign resident is not subject to taxation in its country of residence by virtue of the application of the exemption method foreseen in any tax treaty signed with Mexico.

  • In the case of the transfer (alienation) of shares, if such transfer is carried out under the rules of a corporate restructure as established in any tax treaty signed by Mexico.

As it can be seen in the case at hand, it is important to review in detail the new rules regarding the deductibility for payments abroad contained in the 2014 Tax Reform and other miscellaneous regulations to fulfill all the requirements regarding treaty application.

David Cuellar (david.cuellar@mx.pwc.com) and Nidia Sanchez (nidia.sanchez@mx.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +52 55 5263 5816

Fax: +52 55 5263 6010

Website: www.pwc.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article