Chile: Law with changes in Chilean foreign tax credit system published

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Chile: Law with changes in Chilean foreign tax credit system published

benedetto.jpg

zaidan.jpg

Sandra Benedetto


Adriana Zaidan

On January 31 2014, Law No. 20.727 (the law) was published, amending several tax rules on different subjects. Among such amendments, the law brought some improvements to the system of unilateral and bilateral foreign tax credits (FTC), with retroactive application to January 1 2014. Traditionally, Chilean the FTC system has been subject to several limitations. In brief, (i) unilateral FTC has only been available in case of certain types of income, that is dividends (direct and indirect FTC), royalties, technical assistance services and PE income; (ii) broadly speaking, for dividends, the amount of FTC was limited to the lower amount between 30% of the taxpayer's foreign income and 30% of its foreign source net income (FSNI). In the other cases, unilateral FCT was limited to the lower between the amount of first category tax paid on taxpayers' foreign income and 30% of its FSNI; (iii) only a two tier indirect FTC was available; and (iv) credits were extinguished in case the taxpayer registered tax losses in the year where FTC were paid or in the following years (in case a carry-back of losses applied).

As illustrated below, the law reduces some of the limitations mentioned above, although it does not extend unilateral FTC to other concepts (such as capital gains and interest).

Accordingly, the law increases the unilateral FTC limits from 30% to 32% of the FSNI. Only in case of dividends, there is an increase in the FTC limitation that considers the foreign income received by the taxpayers (from 30% to 32%). In what concerns bilateral FTC, the limits of 30% of the total taxpayer income and 30% of the taxpayer's FSNI were increased to 35% in case the beneficial owner of the relevant income is a Chilean resident. As a result of such differences between unilateral and bilateral FTC limits, Chilean taxpayers will now have to calculate two types of FSNI: one considering foreign income derived from treaty countries and the other taking into account foreign income sourced in non-treaty countries.

Additionally, the new rules grant to Chilean taxpayers unilateral indirect FTC reaching as many tiers as may exist, to the extent that all the subsidiaries are resident of the same country of the first tier subsidiary and that the first tier subsidiary owns, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the shares of the other subsidiaries.

In what concerns the use of FTC when the Chilean taxpayer receiving the foreign income is in a loss situation, the law introduces a rule that allows unlimited carry-forward of FTC received in connection with dividends. However, in a contradictory manner, a previous rule stating that FTC were totally extinguished if obtained in a period where the Chilean beneficiary presented a tax loss was not revoked by the new legislation.

No reference is made to the treatment of unilateral FTC received by companies in a tax loss position in connection with other concepts of income or to the credits received as a result of double tax treaties.

Sandra Benedetto (sandra.benedetto@cl.pwc.com) and Adriana Zaidan (adriana.zaidan@cl.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +56 2 940 0155

Website: www.pwc.com/cl

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

A lack of commitment from major jurisdictions and the associated compliance burden are obstacles facing the OECD initiative
Richard Gregg is no longer fit and proper to be a tax agent, said the TPB; in other news, MHA completed its acquisition of Baker Tilly South-East Europe
Recent Indian case law emphasises the importance of economic substance over mere legal form in evaluating tax implications, say authors from Khaitan & Co
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the ATO was advised by MinterEllison, an Australian-headquartered law firm
Three tax experts dissect the impact of a 30% tariff that has shaken up trade relations between South Africa and the US
Awards
ITR is delighted to reveal all the shortlisted nominees for the 2025 Americas Tax Awards
As we move into an era of ‘substance over form’, determining the fundamental nature of a particular instrument is key when evaluating the tax implications of selling hybrid securities
It stands in stark contrast to a mere 1% increase in firmwide revenue since last year
It follows a court case concerning a Freedom of Information request lodged by the founder of a software company
After years of deafening silence, the UK tax authority is taking overdue action against corporates that fail to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion
Gift this article