Germany: Self-disclosure rule amendments bring good and bad news for corporates

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Self-disclosure rule amendments bring good and bad news for corporates

welbers.jpg

Hartwig Welbers

Self-disclosure allows tax evaders to avoid prosecution by coming forward of their own volition and paying the tax evaded. In principle, this opportunity is to be retained, although many believe that the current rules need to be tightened. The Ministry of Finance has now published draft amending legislation to that end. This subject is relevant to corporates in respect of their mass data filings of monthly VAT and payroll withholding. Because it is not easy for the authorities to distinguish between an error and a wilful attempt to defraud, there is a growing tendency to see corrected returns as failed self-disclosures (because they often cannot meet all the formal requirements) and to open criminal proceedings. The new ministerial draft now published tackles this issue by re-introducing partial self-disclosure for monthly or quarterly VAT or payroll withholding tax returns. A corrected return will not fail in respect of the corrections.

The bad news is that the tax audit preclusion of self-disclosure is to be tightened. Up to now, self-disclosure is no longer possible once a tax auditor sets foot on the premises. This point in time is to be brought forward to the notification to the company of the coming audit and audit concept is to be extended to include VAT, withholding tax and other specifically targeted reviews and examinations. The implications of this on very large corporations with a tax auditor more or less permanently in residence remain, however, open.

The Ministry of Finance does not see the new rules as burdensome on compliant businesses. This, however, overlooks the reality of the effort needed to prepare and substantiate a self-disclosure statement of more than errors in monthly or quarterly VAT or payroll withholding tax returns, say, to protect corporate officers from prosecution for having taken a risky position. This is, in particular, true as the limitations period will be extended to 10 years. One also needs to bear in mind the continuing discussion on a possible corporate criminal law to sanction a corporation for wrong-doing, rather than just the employees acting on the company's behalf. All things considered, effective supervision of a company's compliance is becoming more and more essential.

Hartwig Welbers (hartwig.welbers@de.pwc.com)

PwC

Tel: +49 711 25034 3165

Website: www.pwc.de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Prudential had challenged HMRC over VAT group relief; in other news, Donald Trump unveiled timber and wood tariffs, and the European Commission published a ViDA implementation strategy
Australia’s CbCR rules have ‘widespread support’ and do not put American companies at a competitive disadvantage, the FACT Coalition said
Baker McKenzie advised two of the member firms involved, while several advisers provided transaction counsel to US-based Grant Thornton Advisors
Foreign remittance requirements put additional administrative burden on Indian law firms and strain their relationship with foreign associate firms, according to practitioners
Gift this article