Bulgaria: New appendix to the corporate annual tax return

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Bulgaria: New appendix to the corporate annual tax return

pechilkova.jpg

Donka Pechilkova

The Bulgarian Ministry of Finance added an important new Appendix (Reference No.1 to Appendix 4) to the annual tax return that legal entities are obliged to submit for the calendar year of 2013. The appendix concerns transactions between related parties (both local and foreign ones) and transactions that were carried out with companies registered in offshore zones. In the application, all companies are obliged to disclose the amounts of such transactions that were settled during the year, as well as the type of the transactions (sales or purchases of goods, services and so on; loans; intercompany remunerations and other types of incomes or expenses). Due to the fact that the above-mentioned changes also concern transactions with physical persons, on March 10 2014 the National Revenue Agency published instructions for the filling out of Reference No.1 to Appendix 4 of the annual tax return declaration according to the text and meaning of Article 92 of the Corporate Income Tax Act and Reference No.7 to Appendix 4 of the annual tax return, related to Article 50 of the Income Taxes on Natural Persons Act. The aforementioned guidelines also attempt to clarify the ambiguity of the phrase "persons that have carried out transactions" included in Reference No. 1, which in some cases is replaced with "settled transactions", creating an obvious inconsistency in the method of reporting of loans and other transactions.

The guidelines also indicate the exceptions when it is not necessary to provide information for Reference No. 1, such as dividends and liquidation proceeds, personal performing of work by partners or owners in non-labour relationships in the company, with duly provided tax and insurance information. One must not forget that in cases of failure to file an appendix to the annual tax return or if false or incorrect data is provided, the penalty to be imposed ranges between 100 to 1,000 lev ($70 to $700) (Article 262 of the Corporate Income Tax Act). In this regard, it is stated that considering the fact that Appendix No 4 is a new requirement and not well-known to taxpayers, one should be cautious about the presence of any errors.

This new requirement is another step made by the tax administration towards the building of a harmonised tax system in the country, and one which will also cover the requirements of the EU legislation and meet the needs for a unified international tax control.

Donka Pechilkova (donka.pechilkova@eurofast.eu)

Eurofast Global, Sofia Office

Tel: +359 2 988 69 78

Website: www.eurofast.eu

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article