Australian Taxation Office considers outsourcing tax assurance for large businesses

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian Taxation Office considers outsourcing tax assurance for large businesses

ato100x90.png

The Australian Taxation Office is setting up a pilot programme which could result in auditors of large businesses with turnover of between A$100 million ($95 million) and A$5 billion conducting assurance on behalf of the tax authorities.

The external compliance assurance process (ECAP) pilot will look at the effectiveness and viability of using existing registered company auditors to conduct assurance on factual matters.

“If effective, this approach will reduce compliance costs and red tape for business taxpayers and ensure that the right amount of tax is being paid in Australia,” an ATO statement said.

The ATO wants to be able to offer businesses the choice of using their own auditors to do the work or leaving it to the tax authorities.

The ECAP project began in November 2013 as a broad consultation with taxpayers and other stakeholders, with the work being split between three working groups: role and fit of tax advice; auditor independence and materiality and assurance.

The role and fit of tax advice group highlighted concerns such as threats to independence, cost and timing and when a matter in the ECAP process became contestable.

The members of the auditor independence group raised issues such as when the auditor’s firm has also provided the tax advice in a matter that is part of the ECAP process and the provision of an opinion over tax advice.

“This could open a discussion over whose view is correct and could require us to set up a review-the-reviewer process, which we seek to avoid,” the ATO said.

The materiality and assurance group were concerned about the risk of the ATO’s thresholds and risk metrics being disclosed in an ECAP process, and differences between materiality standards.

The pilot is expected to be in two phases under an agreed-upon process engagement. The first will be a small group that will test the design of an ECAP programme and work through any flaws, and will involve an ATO control group. The proposal is to limit the first phase to about 32 clients (16 ATO cases and 16 ECAP cases) with the clients spread being across the Big 4 and four tier 2 firms to start with.

“Depending on the results of the first phase, the second phase would involve a much broader pilot or integration into our ongoing compliance work,” the ATO said.

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Tax teams are responding to usual client demand in the region, albeit with increased working from home flexibility, local sources indicate
A 120-plus-day delay to refunds would cost taxpayers almost $3bn in additional interest, the Cato Institute warned; plus indirect tax updates from February
The Office for Budget Responsibility’s pessimistic pillar two forecast accompanied the UK chancellor’s muted Spring Statement, dubbed ‘as dull as possible’ by one adviser
Digital tax reform is dissolving the old ‘temporal buffer’, forcing systems, institutions, and professionals to adapt as real-time reporting reshapes governance, capability, and compliance
Our first instalment features analysis of Deloitte’s landmark EMEA merger, Donald Trump’s Supreme Court tariff showdown and Venezuela’s tax evolution
While some believe it could have a positive effect on the wider advisory landscape, others argue that HMRC’s ‘red tape’ exercise won’t deter bad actors
The political optics of the US’s carve-out deal are poor, but as the Fair Tax Foundation’s Paul Monaghan writes, it preserves pillar two’s guiding ethos
The big four firm reportedly sent ‘threatening’ correspondence to Unity Advisory over its hiring of ex-PwC partners; plus tax recruitment news from the week
Tom Goldstein, who was represented by US law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, denied wilfully cheating on his taxes and blamed errors on his staff
Multinationals face rising TP scrutiny as global rules diverge. As Daniel Moalusi argues, strong, consistent documentation is now essential to minimise audit risk and protect tax positions
Gift this article