US Inbound: IRS international practice units

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US Inbound: IRS international practice units

fuller.jpg

forst.jpg

Jim Fuller


David Forst

As a part of the IRS Large Business & International Division's knowledge management efforts, international practice units have been developed through internal collaboration and serve as both aids and training materials on international tax issues. They are not official pronouncements of law, and cannot be used, cited or relied upon as such. The IRS issued two new inbound international practice units in July 2015: non-services FDAP [fixed or determinable, annual or periodical] income; and branch-level interest tax concepts. The practice unit dealing with branch-level interest tax concepts provides a pretty good analysis of the rules under § 884(f). A branch-level interest tax is composed of two parts: a withholding tax imposed on interest paid by a US branch to a foreign person (referred to as branch interest) and a tax imposed on the excess of the foreign corporation's interest allocable to income connected to effectively connected income over its branch interest (referred to as excess interest). This practice unit would provide a good review for someone interested in understanding § 884(f).

The non-services FDAP income practice unit focuses on royalty income as an example. The IRS examiner is directed to determine whether the foreign corporation licensor (FC) has an office in the US through which it licenses software to other customers. The IRS examiner is directed to determine whether FC has employees in the US who provide aftermarket technical services related to the software. These are important facts in analysing whether the royalty income would be treated as effectively connected with a US trade or business. The IRS examiner is also told to confirm that the software is licensed and not sold (sale of copyrighted articles). The practice unit provides a reasonably thorough approach to auditing these transactions.

The practice units make references to IPNs (international practice networks). These are IRS employee groups that network in designated areas to broaden, enhance, and share their experiences. They are, more or less, groups of experts on designated issues.

The non-services FDAP income practice unit states that the examiner should consult with the Repatriation/Withholding IPN to determine when the taxpayer's activities create effectively connected income. It also states that the examiner, on a different point, should consult with IRS counsel and the Jurisdiction-to-tax IPN for guidance. The branch-level practice unit refers the examiner to the Treaties IPN for assistance in determining general treaty eligibility including the qualifications under a limitation on benefits article.

Jim Fuller (jpfuller@fenwick.com) and David Forst (dforst@fenwick.com)

Fenwick & West

Tel: +1 650 335 7205; +1 650 335 7274

Website: www.fenwick.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article