Brazil: Provisional Measure 685/2015 extended for another 60-day period

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: Provisional Measure 685/2015 extended for another 60-day period

oliveira.jpg

Julio Oliveira

On July 21 2015, the Brazilian Government issued the controversial Provisional Measure (PM) 685/2015 which, among other provisions, provides for new rules concerning the disclosure of certain transactions to the Brazilian Internal Federal Revenue Service (RFB). Broadly, PM 685/2015 provides that the following types of transactions occurring in the previous year should be disclosed to the RFB by September 30:

  • Actions or operations that cannot be explained by relevant commercial, business or economic motivations;

  • Actions where the form of the transaction is unusual, uses indirect operations or specific contractual clauses to recharacterise (in whole or in part) the typical contract; or

  • Actions or operations explicitly provided for in a future Act to be issued by the RFB.

The form and conditions for making this disclosure still need to be regulated by the RFB.

In Brazil, a provisional measure is a provisionary law issued by the executive branch of the Brazilian Government, which has the authority of law until it is acted upon by the Brazilian Congress within a prescribed 60-day period. If Congress does not act within this initial period then the measure expires, unless it is extended for an additional 60-day period. On September 9 2015 the Brazilian Congress extended the PM 685/15 for the additional 60-day period.

PM 685/2015 has already generated substantial debate in Brazil. There has been particular concern surrounding the potentially broad application of the rules as well as the lack of regulation and guidance accompanying the provisions. This concern seems to have been heard by the RFB, which has confirmed: "The intention was to start charging the declaration this year. However, as the PM is under discussion in Congress and will need further clarification, only after we have a final version will we standardise it and make it mandatory."

The RFB also advised that following the discussion in the Brazilian Congress, the RFB will still open the regulations for the declaration for public consultation. As the Measure has apparently already received more than 200 amendments in the Brazilian Congress the RFB considered it more prudent to wait to provide greater legal security to everyone.

Recently, a legal entity incorporated in São Paulo State obtained a preliminary injunction exempting it from the provisions of the PM 685/2015 by challenging its constitutionality. To date, the final decision in relation to this dispute has not been issued.

Brazilian taxpayers should continue to monitor the developments of the PM's conversion into law.

Julio Oliveira (julio.oliveira@br.pwc.com), São Paulo

PwC

Tel: +55 11 3674 2276

Website: www.pwc.com.br

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

ITR’s data has highlighted the US firm’s ambition to become America’s ‘premier’ tax player via a concerted partner recruitment strategy
Jaap Zwaan’s arrival continues a recent streak of A&M Tax investing in the region; in other news, the US and Japan struck a deal that significantly lowered tariff rates
In a world where international tax concepts rely on human activity, Leonard Wagenaar poses existential questions about the future of such ideas when AI is ever-present
France v Axa provides a practical illustration of how the burden of proof is applied in TP matters under French law, ITR also heard
In an exclusive interview with ITR, Ian Gary calls for a central public CbCR database and bemoans the US’s lack of involvement in international tax transparency
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
In the first of a new series of weekly opinion pieces, ITR Editor Tom Baker reflects on the OECD’s attempts to sanitise the US’s brazen pillar two negotiations
The threat of 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods coincides with new Brazilian legal powers to adopt retaliatory economic measures, local experts tell ITR
The country’s chancellor appears to have backtracked from previous pillar two scepticism; in other news, Donald Trump threatened Russia with 100% tariffs
In its latest G20 update, the OECD also revealed tense discussions with the US where the ‘significant threat’ of Section 899 was highlighted
Gift this article