Germany: Repayment of nominal capital

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Germany: Repayment of nominal capital

linn.jpg

braun.jpg

Alexander Linn


Thorsten Braun

For multinationals with profit-making German subsidiaries, withholding tax on dividends can be an issue when repatriating profits from Germany, especially considering Germany's complex anti-treaty shopping rules and this often leads to an investor not receiving full treaty or EU directive benefits. Thus, opportunities to transfer cash from German subsidiaries by other means than dividends have become a consideration. For tax purposes, a distribution would usually be treated as a dividend (triggering withholding tax) and not as a repayment of capital (sourced from the tax equity account) as long as a company has distributable profits (E&P). Broadly speaking, once a company has had a balance sheet profit in one year, it can no longer directly access the tax equity account and would be deemed to pay dividends until the distributable profits have been consumed.

In a recent decision (IR 31/13), Germany's Federal Tax Court confirmed that a repayment of nominal capital would be treated as a repayment of capital for tax purposes, regardless of the amount of distributable profits. The decision confirms that a repayment of nominal capital allows taxpayers to directly access the tax equity account, meaning that the distribution will be treated as a repayment of capital for tax purposes. In that respect, the court even confirmed that a reduction and repayment of nominal capital do not necessarily have to take place within the same year and do not necessarily have to be included in the same shareholder resolution; this is legally required only for German stock corporations (AG), but not for German limited companies (GmbH). If a reduction and repayment of nominal capital are sufficiently closely linked and it is possible to demonstrate that the distribution was sourced from the reduction of nominal capital (and not from other capital or profit reserves), it would not be considered a dividend for tax purposes.

Alexander Linn (allinn@deloitte.de) and Thorsten Braun (tbraun@deloitte.de)

Deloitte

Tel: +49 89 29036 8558 and +49 69 75695 6444

Website: www.deloitte.com/de

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

It should be easy for advisers to be transparent about costs, Brown Rudnick partner Matthew Sharp said in response to exclusive ITR in-house data
The sprawling legislation phases out Joe Biden-era green tax incentives for businesses; in other news, the UK will reportedly maintain its DST despite US pressure
New French legislation should create a more consistent legal environment for taxing gains from management packages, say Bruno Knadjian and Sylvain Piémont of Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
The South Africa vs SC ruling may embolden the tax authority to take a more aggressive approach to TP assessments, an adviser tells ITR
Indirect tax professionals now rate compliance as a bigger obstacle than technology and automation; in other news, Italy approved a VAT cut on art sales
AI-powered tax agents are likely to be the next big development in tax technology, says Russell Gammon of Tax Systems
FTI Consulting’s EMEA head of employment tax and reward tells ITR about celebrating diversity in the profession, his love of musicals, and what makes tax cool
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and US President Donald Trump have agreed that the countries will look to conclude a deal by July 21, 2025
The firm’s lack of transparency regarding its tax leaks scandal should see the ban extended beyond June 30, senators Deborah O’Neill and Barbara Pocock tell ITR
Despite posing significant administrative hurdles, digital services taxes remain ‘the best way forward’ for emerging economies, says Neil Kelley, COO of Ascoria
Gift this article