India: Progress towards GST continues as dispute environment evolves

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India: Progress towards GST continues as dispute environment evolves

Sponsored by

logo.png
The introduction of GST is seen as an eagerly awaited

India is gearing towards the introduction of a goods and services tax (GST), a destination-based consumption tax, replacing several central and state taxes.

Dharawat-Rakesh-100
Gangadharan-Hariharan-100

Rakesh Dharawat

Hariharan Gangadharan

India is gearing towards the introduction of a goods and services tax (GST), a destination-based consumption tax, replacing several central and state taxes. The introduction of GST is seen as an eagerly awaited transformational change to the indirect tax landscape in the country which subsumes a variety of taxes currently being levied at the central and state levels.

While legislation to give effect to the GST moves through parliament and state legislatures, draft reports on processes for registration, payment and refunds have been released and suggestions have been invited from trade and industry. Given the transformative nature of this reform, and the several challenges anticipated in the transition process, a consultative approach on the key aspects will go a long way in assuaging taxpayer concerns.

It is expected that these draft reports and the suggestions received from stakeholders will form the basis of a guidance note for the purpose of drafting GST laws. This consultation process will be critical in ensuring that concerns surrounding the practical operation of GST at ground level are highlighted and addressed.

Bombay High Court rules in favour of Vodafone in its $1.3 billion transfer pricing dispute

The Bombay High Court set aside the order of the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had upheld a transfer pricing adjustment of approximately $1.3 billion against Vodafone India Services Pvt. Ltd. The adjustment pertained to the year 2007-2008 and related to the applicability of transfer pricing provisions to an alleged transfer of call options and the sale of a call centre business. The High Court relied on the findings of the Supreme Court in the case of Vodafone International Holdings BV (in relation to the indirect transfer of downstream Indian companies to it by the Hutchison group) and concluded that there was in fact no transfer of the call options. Accordingly, it ruled that the question of applying transfer pricing provisions did not arise. The High Court also set aside the adjustment made in relation to the sale of the call centre business.

While this decision is based on the somewhat specific facts of this case, it will nonetheless contribute to India's jurisprudence on transfer pricing matters. The government has indicated that a decision on whether to appeal to the Supreme Court will be taken after studying the High Court's judgment.

Applicability of minimum alternate tax (MAT) to foreign companies – Supreme Court disposes of Castleton's appeal

The Supreme Court disposed of the appeal filed by Castleton Investment Limited against the order of the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) holding that MAT would apply to foreign companies. Last month, the government had issued a press release stating that MAT would not apply to foreign companies unless they had a permanent establishment (PE) or place of business in India. It had also stated that necessary amendments to the Income-tax Act to give effect to this position would be introduced. Based on a statement by the Attorney General that the government would abide by the decision announced vide the press release, the Supreme Court disposed of the appeal. While the text of the proposed amendment and the timing thereof are not yet known, the disposal of the Castleton case based on the government's decision will hopefully bring a satisfactory conclusion to this controversial issue.

Rakesh Dharawat (rakesh.dharawat@dhruvaadvisors.com) and Hariharan Gangadharan (hariharan.gangadharan@dhruvaadvisors.com)
Dhruva Advisors

Tel: +91 2261081000

Website: www.dhruvaadvisors.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

The UK Government’s plans to close the tax gap via increased HM Revenue and Customs investment have failed to impress local tax advisers
Under the merged scheme for R&D tax relief introduced last year, rules on contracted out R&D have changed. James Dudbridge argues for a proactive approach when reviewing companies’ commercial arrangements
Cultural nuances could account for tax advisers’ perceived poor cost management, a local partner told ITR
Updated rules represent a significant shift in the Luxembourg TP landscape and emphasise the need for robust arm’s-length calculations, says Vanessa Ramos Ferrin of TransFair Pricing Solutions
KPMG Law US revolves around contract managed services and the US is the largest market for that, Stuart Bedford tells ITR in an exclusive interview
The US law firm’s tax counsel tells ITR about inspirations from a ‘legendary’ German tax scholar, perfecting riesling wine and what makes tax cool
Wopke Hoekstra also swore the EU would ‘hit back harder’ if faced with a trade war; in other news, a UK watchdog has launched an investigation into an audit completed by MHA
Other reasons included the complexity of reporting, resource constraints and interactions with tax administrations
Despite this boost for investors, the OECD also said that extensive reliance on income-based instruments across economies is concerning
A recent UK First-tier Tribunal decision highlights the broad application of an anti-avoidance rule to deny tax relief, say Robert Waterson and Matthew Cummings of Eversheds Sutherland
Gift this article