Middle East: The impact of FATCA on financial institutions in the GCC

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Middle East: The impact of FATCA on financial institutions in the GCC

AdobeStock_178203234_impact

With the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) reporting deadlines approaching, foreign financial institutions (FFIs) should ensure they understand the impact of FATCA in their organisation and the compliance requirements they are subject to under the intergovernmental agreement (IGA), signed or agreed in substance, between the US and several countries in the GCC including: the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain.

dawson.jpg

torres.jpg

Claire Dawson


Diana Torres

FATCA is a US regulatory requirement that seeks to prevent US taxpayers who hold financial assets in non-US financial institutions (foreign financial institutions or FFIs) and other offshore vehicles from avoiding their US tax obligations. The intention is for FFIs to identify and report to the IRS, any US persons holding assets abroad and for certain non-financial foreign entities (NFFEs) to identify their substantial US owners.

Failure to enter into an agreement or provide required documentation may result in the imposition of a 30% withholding tax on certain payments made to such customers and counterparties.

As the aforementioned countries have agreed in substance, or signed, a Model 1 IGA with the US Government, every entity that meets the FATCA FFI definition, not otherwise exempt under the IGA, will have to comply with the requirements established by the IGA including:

  • Register with the IRS and obtain a Global Intermediary Identification Number (GIIN);

  • Classify their financial accounts for FATCA purposes; and

  • Report US accounts identified (US accounts are financial accounts held by US taxpayers, or held by foreign entities in which US taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest)

Financial institutions in these jurisdictions must make sure they meet the reporting deadline set out by the local regulator. Participating FFIs will be required to file information with respect to the 2014 calendar year (that is, for individual financial accounts on boarded after July 1 2014) before September 30 2015 (please note that this is the deadline for the local regulator to report to the IRS; the FFI's deadline is likely to be earlier and will be announced by the local regulator in due course).

The main challenge faced by FFIs in these jurisdictions has been the limited guidance provided by local regulators, particularly with respect to reporting; in certain instances no dates have been provided, nor a portal made available to the FFIs. Some regulators have indicated that a portal will only be made available once the IGA has been signed, which could potentially give FFIs limited time to report. FFIs should ensure they have the reporting data available in extractable format so they are able to meet the reporting deadline once it is announced.

Financial institutions should also be looking to future reporting requirements, namely the OECD's Common Reporting Standard (CRS). The CRS requires the reporting of assets held in one country by residents, nationals or taxpayers of another jurisdiction. More than 90 different countries have now committed to comply with this standard, including KSA, Qatar and the UAE with effect from 2018.

Claire Dawson (cdawson@deloitte.com) and Diana Torres (ditorres@deloitte.com)

Deloitte

Tel: +971 (0) 4506 4900 and +971 (0) 4506 4893

Website: www.deloitte.com/middleeast

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

Long-running, high-value and complex enquiries are a significant reason for HM Revenue and Customs’s increased TP yield, experts suggest
Landmark legal updates in India have led companies to prioritise specialised tax advisers over accountants, ITR has found
Brazil’s shift to a nationwide consumption tax is more than conceptual; it fundamentally transforms municipal revenue, enforcement, and administrative disputes
While some advisers praised the ruling’s definition of a ‘voucher’ for VAT purposes, a UK partner said the case left unanswered questions
While pillar two has been enacted on paper in Brazil, companies are encountering a range of practical compliance issues, ITR has heard
Moore, founding partner of the Chicago tax boutique which bears her name, shares her career wisdom for ITR’s new Women in Tax interview series
But partners at the firm admit that jumping ship to the US would not be as easy as some believe
Governments are rewriting tax policy for the AI era, deploying digital taxes, tailored incentives and algorithmic enforcement that redefine where value is created
Wingrove will succeed Bill Thomas, who has served in the role since 2017; in other news, Andersen unveiled a sharp increase in revenues for 2025
Partners are divided on Italy vs PDM D’s analytical depth, evidentiary standards, and what the judgment signals for future intra-group financing cases
Gift this article