Canada: CRA GAAR committee documents compelled – Superior Plus Corp v the Queen

International Tax Review is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Garden, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada: CRA GAAR committee documents compelled – Superior Plus Corp v the Queen

kroft.jpg

richardson.jpg

Ed Kroft, QC


Casey Richardson-Scott

The Tax Court of Canada recently considered a taxpayer's entitlement to access records and information during the examination for discovery process regarding the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) decision to apply the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR). In Superior Plus Corp v the Queen 2015 TCC 132, the taxpayer had appealed an assessment based, in part, on the decision of the CRA to apply the GAAR to a conversion of an income trust to a Canadian corporation. The taxpayer brought a motion to compel the CRA to answer questions that were refused during examination for discovery, to produce un-redacted copies of certain documents, and to produce documents for which production was refused outright, all pertaining to the CRA's decision to apply GAAR in the circumstances and to the underlying policies in the Income Tax Act (Canada) (ITA) that the CRA determined had been abused. The CRA had principally refused to answer the questions and produce the documents at issue on the basis of relevance.

In its decision, the Tax Court of Canada emphasised that the relevance threshold at the discovery stage is low. The court ultimately ordered that a majority of the refused questions be answered, and that a majority of the refused documents be produced in un-redacted form. Specifically, the court ordered that questions regarding the following be answered:

  • Facts, information or knowledge contributing to the Attorney General's position to be taken at trial;

  • Facts, information or knowledge regarding the Department of Finance's considerations as to whether to make a subsequent amendment to the ITA retroactive; and

  • The Attorney General's understanding of the policy regarding loss trading under the ITA, as well as the policy underlying the introduction of the SIFT conversion rules.

The court further ordered that the following types of documents be produced in un-redacted form:

  • GAAR committee meeting notes and minutes;

  • Memoranda to file written by CRA auditors;

  • Emails between CRA officials and auditors regarding the GAAR and loss trading; and

  • Memoranda to the GAAR committee from the Aggressive Tax Planning division of the CRA.

In summary, the Superior Plus Corp. decision appears to permit taxpayers to access GAAR committee communications, meeting minutes, and memoranda. The decision may help to encourage CRA transparency in the discovery process, particularly in matters concerning the GAAR or perhaps even when taxpayers seek such information through Freedom of Information processes.

Ed Kroft, QC (ed.kroft@blakes.com) and Casey Richardson-Scott (casey.richardsonscott@blakes.com), Toronto

Blake, Cassels & Graydon

Tel: +1 416 863 2500/+1 604 631 5200 and 1 416 863 4024

Website: www.blakes.com

more across site & shared bottom lb ros

More from across our site

In the age of borderless commerce, money flows faster than regulation. While digital platforms cross oceans in milliseconds, tax authorities often lag. Indonesia has decided it can wait no longer
The tariffs are disrupting global supply chains and creating a lot of uncertainty, tax expert Miguel Medeiros told ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum
Corporate counsel should combine deep technical knowledge with strategic dynamism, says Agarwal, winner of ITR’s EMEA In-house Indirect Tax Leader of the Year award
Luxembourg’s reform agenda continues at pace in 2025, with targeted measures for start-ups and alternative investment funds
Veteran Elizabeth Arrendale will lead the new advisory practice, which will support clients with M&A tax structuring, post-deal integration, and more
MAP cases keep increasing, and cases closed aren’t keeping pace with the number started, the OECD’s Sriram Govind also told an ITR summit
Nobody likes paperwork or paying money, but the assertion that legal accreditation doesn’t offer value to firms and clients alike is false
Ryan hopes the buyout will help it expand into Asia and the Middle East; in other news, three German finance ministers have called for a suspension of pillar two
SKAT, which was represented by Pinsent Masons, had accused Sanjay Shah and other defendants of fraudulent dividend tax refund claims
TP managers must be able to explain technical issues in simple terms, ITR’s European Transfer Pricing Forum heard
Gift this article